Design and implementation of an Omaha System-based integrated nursing management model for patients with newly-diagnosed diabetes

Wei, Lili; Wang, Jingyuan; Li, Zhenyun; Zhang, Yan; Gao, Yufang

doi:10.1016/j.pcd.2018.11.001

Cited by 14 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nurse Coaching has gained considerable recognition as the NC role has expanded in various clinical settings; from institutional organizations, outpatient clinics, and telehealth services to private practice (Black et al, 2014; Delaney & Bark, 2019; Flo et al, 2019; Holt et al, 2020; Roberton, 2019; Wei et al, 2019; Young et al, 2014). This study shows that NC practice can be broadly supported in such diverse contexts.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Evidence-Based Interventions for the Nurse Coach Scope of Practice Within the Omaha System Guidelines Corpus

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to examine nurse coach scope of practice in relation to existing evidence-based guideline interventions using the Omaha System. The majority of interventions were within scope for nurse coach practice, and problem, category, and target terms showed differential nurse coach practice applicability across interventions. The Omaha System terminology was aligned with nurse coach practice in that both represent and employ comprehensive and holistic perspectives. This study provides a platform for multiple initiatives in nurse coach quality and documentation and provides a methodology for examining the Omaha System guidelines and interventions for other interprofessional roles.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Evidence-Based Interventions for the Nurse Coach Scope of Practice Within the Omaha System Guidelines Corpus

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Studies investigating the use of SNTs (NANDA‐I, NNN, NANDA‐I/NIC, and OS transitional care programs) in different populations, reported a statistically significant enhancement in several physiological or clinical outcomes such as glycemic control (Cardenas‐Valladolid et al, 2012; Pérez Rivas et al, 2016; Wei et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2017), blood pressure control (Cardenas‐Valladolid et al, 2012;Pérez Rivas et al, 2016; Zhang et al, 2017), lipid levels (Pérez Rivas et al, 2016; Zhang et al, 2017), weight control (Zhang et al, 2017), sleep quality (Laguna‐Parras et al, 2013; Liu et al, 2021), and post‐postoperative complications (da Silva et al, 2019; Liu et al, 2021). However, some authors have not confirmed a significant improvement in patients for lipid levels (Cardenas‐Valladolid et al, 2012; Zhao et al, 2020), sleep quality (Mello et al, 2016), and weight control (Cardenas‐Valladolid et al, 2012).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several authors reported a significant association between the use of SNTs (OS, NANDA‐I, and NNN linkages) and the patients' quality of life (Akkus & Akdemir, 2012; Gencbas et al, 2018; Liu et al, 2021; O'Brien‐Pallas et al, 2002; Wei et al, 2019; Wong & Yeung, 2015; Zhang et al, 2017, 2018; Zhuang et al, 2021). However, these results were not confirmed by other authors using OS and NIC interventions (Erci, 2012; Schein et al, 2005).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of standardized nursing terminologies on patient and organizational outcomes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Bertocchi

Dante

Cerra

et al. 2023

J of Nursing Scholarship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimsTo explore the impact of 12 American Nurses Association recognized standardized nursing terminologies (SNTs) on patient and organizational outcomes.BackgroundPrevious studies reported an effect of SNTs on outcomes, but no previous frameworks nor meta‐analyses were found.DesignSystematic review and meta‐analyses.Review MethodsPubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and OpenGrey databases were last consulted in July 2021. All abstracts and full texts were screened independently by two researchers. The review included primary quantitative studies that reported an association between recognized SNTs and outcomes. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias and certainty of evidence for each meta‐analyzed outcome using the “Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation” (GRADE) approach.ResultsFifty‐three reports were included. NANDA‐NIC‐NOC and Omaha System were the most frequently reported SNTs used in the studies. Risk of bias in randomized controlled trials and not‐randomized controlled trials ranged from high to unclear, this risk was low in cross‐sectional studies. The number of nursing diagnoses NANDA‐I moderately correlated with the intensive care unit length of stay (r = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.31–0.44). Using the Omaha System nurse‐led transitional care program showed a large increase in both knowledge (d = 1.21; 95% CI = 0.97–1.44) and self‐efficacy (d = 1.23; 95% CI = 0.97–1.48), while a reduction on the readmission rate (OR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.09–0.83). Nursing diagnoses were found to be useful predictors for organizational (length of stay) and patients' outcomes (mortality, quality of life). The GRADE indicated that the certainty of evidence was rated from very low to low.ConclusionsStudies using SNTs demonstrated significant improvement and prediction power in several patients' and organizational outcomes. Further high‐quality research is required to increase the certainty of evidence of these relationships.Clinical relevanceSNTs should be considered by healthcare policymakers to improve nursing care and as essential reporting data about patient's nursing complexity to guide reimbursement criteria.

show abstract

“…The OS has been adopted in many continuous nursing programs and in a variety of settings (Austin et al, 2017;Wei et al, 2019). The systems collect data to identify patients' problems on environmental, psychosocial, physiological, and behavioral levels, and is used to conduct tailored interventions through health education, guidance, counseling, treatment, or case management.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of Standardized Nursing Terminologies for Nursing Practice and Healthcare Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Zhang

Peng

et al. 2021

Int J of Nursing Knowl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review evaluates the effectiveness of using standardized terminologies in nursing.Methods: A systematic literature review was performed via PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and OVID databases for articles published between January 1973 and September 2020. The Effective Public Health Practice Project's Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies was used to assess the quality of all included studies.Results: Fourteen studies were selected for data extraction and analysis, which included a total of 24,243 patients and 99 nurses. Of the studies that met the inclusion criteria, the quality of five were of high quality, one was of moderate quality, and eight was of weak quality. All articles were summarized according to two themes: the identification of common outcomes or interventions, and the validation or evaluation of the effectiveness of standard nursing terminology sets. Conclusion:Standardized terminologies in nursing help nurses to implement care plans according to nursing procedures, supervise changes in patients' sensitive indicators, improve patients' health outcomes, and contribute to evidence-based nursing practices and global data resource sharing.Implications for nursing practice: Standardized nursing terminologies have positive effects on clinical practice, are essential for enriching nurses' knowledge, and alter nurses' attitudes regarding education and guidance, which promotes the clinical application of these terminologies.

show abstract

Design and implementation of an Omaha System-based integrated nursing management model for patients with newly-diagnosed diabetes

Cited by 14 publications

References 7 publications

Evaluation of Evidence-Based Interventions for the Nurse Coach Scope of Practice Within the Omaha System Guidelines Corpus

Evaluation of Evidence-Based Interventions for the Nurse Coach Scope of Practice Within the Omaha System Guidelines Corpus

Impact of standardized nursing terminologies on patient and organizational outcomes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Effectiveness of Standardized Nursing Terminologies for Nursing Practice and Healthcare Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About