2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.04.25.22274292
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and implementation of a global site assessment survey among HIV clinics participating in the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) research consortium

Abstract: IntroductionTimely descriptions of HIV service characteristics and their evolution over time across diverse settings are important for monitoring the scale-up of evidence-based program strategies, understanding the implementation landscape, and examining service delivery factors that influence HIV care outcomes.MethodsThe International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA) consortium undertakes periodic cross-sectional surveys on service availability and care at participating HIV treatment sites to c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IeDEA's 2020 site assessment survey was a cross‐sectional survey of 238 HIV care and treatment clinics at academic and community‐based hospitals and health centres participating in the consortium in 2020 as described elsewhere [ 33 ]. The survey collected data on site characteristics, such as facility type and location, patient population served and routine HIV care (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IeDEA's 2020 site assessment survey was a cross‐sectional survey of 238 HIV care and treatment clinics at academic and community‐based hospitals and health centres participating in the consortium in 2020 as described elsewhere [ 33 ]. The survey collected data on site characteristics, such as facility type and location, patient population served and routine HIV care (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strength notwithstanding, clinics participating in the IeDEA research consortium comprise a small subset of the health facilities providing PrEP-sites that may not be fully representative of PrEP service provision and expansion within countries, primarily because the IeDEA is largely focused on HIV treatment, rather than prevention, and it comprises many highvolume clinics focused on specialized HIV care rather than primary health services. Representativeness may further be impacted by the variation in site participation from year to year [16,23,24]. Additionally, it should be noted that IeDEA site assessment surveys rely on selfreport by respondents, which could result in bias due to recall errors and/or social desirability bias [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sites participating in IeDEA are primarily public-sector health facilities providing HIV care and comprise a heterogenous mix of academic and community programs, ranging from rural health centers to tertiary referral hospitals. Every 3-5 years, IeDEA administers a site assessment survey among all sites to collect data on site characteristics and services available to patients [16]. Survey questions include: patient populations served (e.g.…”
Section: Data Source and Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a systematic, hybrid sampling strategy was used to (i) purposefully sample sites that had completed prior IeDEA site surveys to facilitate future longitudinal analyses, and (ii) ensure that selected sites were representative of the larger programmatic cohort by randomly sampling sites stratified by location (urban vs. rural) in line with the clinic distribution within each programmatic cohort. Thus, 32 representative sites from the Southern Africa region (15% of active sites) were included in the site assessment, which included sites that were purposively sampled ( n = 5), randomly sampled ( n = 18), and those in IeDEA's database that are not part of a large programmatic cohort ( n = 9) ( 19 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%