2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Implementation of a Compact Low-Dose Diffraction Enhanced Medical Imaging System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing single-distance PBI and single rocking-angle DEI of mouse and rabbit lungs indicates that DEI yields images of superior contrast than those for PBI, and both techniques show a significant contrast improvement over conventional absorption radiographs (11). The use of DEI with laboratory sources suffers from low monochromatic flux and the resulting long exposure times, which are not compatible with in vivo imaging applications (21,22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Comparing single-distance PBI and single rocking-angle DEI of mouse and rabbit lungs indicates that DEI yields images of superior contrast than those for PBI, and both techniques show a significant contrast improvement over conventional absorption radiographs (11). The use of DEI with laboratory sources suffers from low monochromatic flux and the resulting long exposure times, which are not compatible with in vivo imaging applications (21,22).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The method was initially developed for synchrotron beam lines and has also been implemented using heavily filtered polychromatic x-ray beams from a conventional x-ray tube. 10,13 The second method uses the Talbot-Lau interferometer with three gratings [14][15][16] and a conventional x-ray tube. The required spatial coherence of the beam is achieved by splitting the x-ray beams into many different beamlets using one of the three gratings.…”
Section: -5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several techniques have been demonstrated to be also compatible with standard (nonmicrofocal) x-ray sources. [9][10][11][12][13] This compatibility is crucial to meet the needs of many biological disciplines (e.g., small animal imaging), for example, to perform scans in standard research laboratories, fast, repeatedly, and with a high throughput.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%