2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0263574717000492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and implementation of a variable stiffness actuator based on flexible gear rack mechanism

Abstract: SUMMARYVariable stiffness can improve the capability of human–robot interacting. Based on the mechanism of a flexible rack and gear, a rotational joint actuator named vsaFGR is proposed to regulate the joint stiffness. The flexible gear rack can be regarded as a combination of a non-linear elastic element and a linear adjusting mechanism, providing benefits of compactness. The joint stiffness is in the range of 217–3527 N.m/rad, and it is inversely proportional to the 4th-order of the gear displacement, and ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It uses multiple linear guides in combination with a moving pivot and linear springs to achieve this functionality. Another example of VSA can be found in [20], in which the authors focused on the compactness of the system and obtained a stiffness inversely proportional to the gear displacement. A variable stiffness robotic arm has also been designed [21]: in this case a 7-degrees-of-freedom manipulator takes advantage of VSA to perform different tasks in the SHERPA mission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses multiple linear guides in combination with a moving pivot and linear springs to achieve this functionality. Another example of VSA can be found in [20], in which the authors focused on the compactness of the system and obtained a stiffness inversely proportional to the gear displacement. A variable stiffness robotic arm has also been designed [21]: in this case a 7-degrees-of-freedom manipulator takes advantage of VSA to perform different tasks in the SHERPA mission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Inherent mechanical compliance is another major category for addressing the safety issue in pHRI, which can be briefly classified as joint compliance and link compliance. While extensive research has been conducted on the joint compliance, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] relatively less research has been investigated for the link compliance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, VSA with a passive element can be implemented through different actuation methods, namely, antagonistic motor and independent motor setup, as described in [5]. In combination with the actuation method, different stiffness variation method, such as, changing the pretension of the passive element, changing transmission between load and spring (CompAct-VSA [6], AwAS [7], AwAS II [8], vsaUT II [9]), and changing physical properties of the elastic elements (like flexible elements [10], [11] and McKibben [12], [13]) have been employed in the prior art. Some of the notable designs, such as antagonistic springs with antagonistic motors (VSA-II [14], BAVS [15]), antagonistic springs with independent motors (AMASC [16], [17] and [18]), and independent motor for changing the stiffness and equilibrium position (Maccepa [19], Maccepa 2.0 [20], DLR FSJ [21], SVSA [22]) can also be found in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%