2017
DOI: 10.3390/app7040342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Implementation of a Shape Shifting Rolling–Crawling–Wall-Climbing Robot

Abstract: Abstract:Designing an urban reconnaissance robot is highly challenging work given the nature of the terrain in which these robots are required to operate. In this work, we attempt to extend the locomotion capabilities of these robots beyond what is currently feasible. The design and unique features of our bio-inspired reconfigurable robot, called Scorpio, with rolling, crawling, and wall-climbing locomotion abilities are presented in this paper. The design of the Scorpio platform is inspired by Cebrennus reche… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparing equations (3) and (4) with equations (5) and (6), we see that when the robot crawls on these two infrastructures with triangular gait and creeping gait, the average crawling speed on the large-scale truss structure is slightly faster than that on the large-section truss rod when employing the same pace, step frequency, and crawling gait. Additionally, by comparing equations (7) and (8) with equations (9) and (10), we can see that, in the same situation, when the robot crawls on the large-scale truss structure, the adhesive force fluctuation interval of the leg is slightly smaller than when the robot crawls on the large-section truss rod. Therefore, it can be determined that the adaptability of the robot to the large-scale truss structure is better than to the large-section truss rod.…”
Section: Co-simulation Based On Edem--adams Platformmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…By comparing equations (3) and (4) with equations (5) and (6), we see that when the robot crawls on these two infrastructures with triangular gait and creeping gait, the average crawling speed on the large-scale truss structure is slightly faster than that on the large-section truss rod when employing the same pace, step frequency, and crawling gait. Additionally, by comparing equations (7) and (8) with equations (9) and (10), we can see that, in the same situation, when the robot crawls on the large-scale truss structure, the adhesive force fluctuation interval of the leg is slightly smaller than when the robot crawls on the large-section truss rod. Therefore, it can be determined that the adaptability of the robot to the large-scale truss structure is better than to the large-section truss rod.…”
Section: Co-simulation Based On Edem--adams Platformmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Dai et al [15] and Yin et al [16] successively carried out research on pipeline weld defect detection technology and developed robots for pipeline non-destructive testing, whose work efficiency can be improved in the following research. Several compound mobile mechanisms have been innovatively designed to improve the wall adaptability of a wall-climbing robot, but the conflict between movement flexibility and safe adsorption has not been well resolved [17][18][19]. Several researchers carried detection sensors and cleaning equipment on a wall-climbing robot and developed a series of ship detection and cleaning robots [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A grasping module of cross-arranged claw is designed for the inspection of rough stone and concrete wall surfaces, which performs well in grasping vibrating walls with certain anti-rollover capability [15]. Yanagida et al designed a shape shifting rolling-crawling-wall-climbing robot with wall-climbing locomotion abilities [16]. Xu et al designed a robot for cable inspection with double wheels on both sides [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…µ denotes the friction coefficient between the rolling wheels and the cable surface.Therefore we can get: N a = N b + N c − Mg sin β. Combining Equations (13)-(16), the following constraint equation is obtained:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%