2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and experimental validation of a two-stage superplastic forming die

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values for the material constants K, m, and n, considered in this study, are 159.5, 0.39 and 0.088, respectively. These values are retrieved from (Luckey Jr., Friedman, & Weinmann, 2009) …”
Section: Materials Constitutive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values for the material constants K, m, and n, considered in this study, are 159.5, 0.39 and 0.088, respectively. These values are retrieved from (Luckey Jr., Friedman, & Weinmann, 2009) …”
Section: Materials Constitutive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For three-stage superplastic forming, pressure was varied from 0.1 MPa to 0.8 MPa and for each pressure, superplastic forming experiments were conducted at (5,8,9,10,12,15,18,20,25,27,29 and 30) mm of bulge height to predict the optimum pressure required for uniform thickness distribution. For each bulge height, individual components were formed and the parameters of pole thickness, thickness distribution, relative bulge height, relative bulge radius, forming time, average thickness and thinning factor were determined.…”
Section: Fig 1 Schematic Arrangement Of Three Stage Diementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Jovane [8] has determined superplastic forming parameters, such as k and m, by varying the applied pressure in increments and thus optimized the pressure at which change in strain rate becomes insignificant. Luckey et al [9] have developed a two-stage complex dome employing a superplastic forming process in order to improve the thickness profile and prevent wrinkling effects in AA 5083 alloy sheets. Ragab [10] has examined sticking between the contact surface of the sheet and die in the single-stage forming of a cylindrical cup and further investigated thickness distribution under plane-strain conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luo et al presented a novel SPF process utilizing a mechanical preforming operation of SPF5083 alloy and verified that this process could deliver a superior thickness profile as compared to conventional SPF [7]. Based on the two-stage SPF process, Luckey Jr. et al designed a preform die to improve the thickness profile of SPF5083 alloy parts [8]. Luo et al also compared two-stage gas forming (TSGF) and hot draw mechanical preforming (HDMP) to conventional SPF when forming a SPF5083 alloy part and found that HDMP could provide a superior thickness profile and faster forming cycle than the other two processes [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%