2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2014.6907361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and evolution of a modular tensegrity robot platform

Abstract: Abstract-NASA Ames Research Center is developing a compliant modular tensegrity robotic platform for planetary exploration. In this paper we present the design and evolution of the platform's main hardware component, an untethered, robust tensegrity strut, with rich sensor feedback and cable actuation. Each strut is a complete robot, and multiple struts can be combined together to form a wide range of complex tensegrity robots. Our current goal for the tensegrity robotic platform is the development of SUPERbal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Spherical Underactuated Planetary Exploration Robot (SUPERball) is a tensegrity icosahedron robot currently under development at the NASA Ames Research Center ( Figure 3) [6]. The main design goal of SUPERball is to be a more capable robot than a prior prototype called ReCTeR, to provide more reliable sensors, and to handle rougher environments.…”
Section: Superballmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Spherical Underactuated Planetary Exploration Robot (SUPERball) is a tensegrity icosahedron robot currently under development at the NASA Ames Research Center ( Figure 3) [6]. The main design goal of SUPERball is to be a more capable robot than a prior prototype called ReCTeR, to provide more reliable sensors, and to handle rougher environments.…”
Section: Superballmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of robotic space exploration has many rich and vast studies on explicit implementation concerns, including studies of individual rover systems [45], whole rover concepts [46], highly engineered teams of rovers suited for specific missions [4,47], long-term visions for the global future of space exploration [48], distributed sensor networks for making observations of environmental phenomena through a planning system [49], autonomous observation of temporal phenomena [50], or tools for managing data on space missions [51]. In contrast, in this work, we conduct laboratory-based experiments featuring a team of rovers with the generic capabilities to sense, move, and observe; we do not seek to specify how any of these systems work at the low level, but instead look at the larger implications of the need for teamwork in such a system.…”
Section: Robotic Space Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…et al, 2012;Bruce et al, 2014). In general, moving quasi-statically is advantageous since it requires less powerful actuators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%