Design and evaluation of host identity protocol (HIP) simulation framework for INET/OMNeT++

Bokor, László; Nováczki, Szabolcs; Zeke, László Tamás; Jeney, Gábor

doi:10.1145/1641804.1641827

Cited by 19 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The OMNeT++ simulation framework is an open source, component-based simulation tool that is designed to model communication networks. We also use HIPSim++ (HIP based simulation framework) and xMIPV6 modules (an accurate and extensible mobile IPv6 simulation model for OMNeT++) that are built on top of INET to evaluate the transport architectures with different mobility protocols [29][30][31]. The model simulates the transport architecture options which are defined in the previous section and analyze the performance of MIPv6 and HIP mobility protocols on top of them.…”

Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Realization of Mobile Femtocells: Operational and Protocol Requirements

Namal

Liyanage

Gurtov

2012

Wireless Pers Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Femtocells are commissioned in wide range of commercial systems, such as CDMA, GSM, LTE, Wi-Fi, and WiMAX, and offer economically viable solutions to improve network scalability and indoor coverage. The ability to offer multitude of context-aware and value added services, and per-user customization have caught world-wide research interest on femtocells. In this article, we have investigated the feasibility to use femtocells as short-range mobile base stations, and discussed the demanding architectural requirements and challenges. The protocol stack on legacy femtocells must be modified to realize mobility. Mobility introduces new challenges in security and user privacy. Firstly, we analyze several candidate mobility protocols that are deployable on Mobile Femtocells (MFs). Among them, Host Identity Protocol (HIP) was chosen due to enhanced support in flexible mobility, security and end-user privacy. Secondly, we propose the indispensable modifications that enable device mobility, and the suitable transport architecture options based on direct IP links and relay chains. Finally, with the simulation results, the proposal is verified, and the architectural options are evaluated. That, in turn, proves the proposed mobility protocol has low latency in location locking with respect to another competing protocol and low resource utilization as it is depicted from mean round trip time.

show abstract

Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Realization of Mobile Femtocells: Operational and Protocol Requirements

Namal

Liyanage

Gurtov

2012

Wireless Pers Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We have developed a discrete event simulation model and implemented it in OMNet++ 4.0 network simulator [19] using HIPSim++ simulation framework [20] to measure the handover performance of our scheme and compare against the HIP and Micro-HIP [16] models. The simulation environment under which we examined the models constitutes of two IEEE 802.11b sub-networks with S-RVSs co-located within the access routers.…”

Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Host Identity Protocol extension supporting localized mobility management

Muslam

Chan

Ventura

2011

2011 IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Host Identity Protocol (HIP) has security support to enable secured mobility and multihoming, both of which are essential for future Internet applications. Yet micro-mobility has not been efficiently and securely addressed by HIP and other mechanisms based on it. This paper introduces a method based on HIP to support micro-mobility in an efficient and secure manner. We present the architectural elements of the framework and show through discussion and simulation results that our scheme can achieve negligible handover latency and few packet loss.

show abstract

“…Nonetheless, LNA introduces overhead with mappings, as they 2.6 End-host Multihoming are performed twice. -- [Bokor, 2013] b [Gurtov, 2013] c [Khan, 2013] The pros and cons of the reviewed proposals for end-host multihoming support are summarized in Table 2.5, according to the multihoming goals fulfillment.…”

Section: End-host Non-standard Proposalsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Different approaches may be followed to explore multiple addresses in mobile networks. HIPSim++ [Bokor et al, 2009] is an implementation of the Host Identity Protocol (HIP) [Moskowitz and Nikander, 2006] [Stewart, 2007] to support concurrent multipath transfers. Once again, this solution does not allow MIPv6 nodes to support multiple addresses without the assistance of another protocol such as SCTP.…”

Section: State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%