2000
DOI: 10.1118/1.599019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and evaluation of an LSO PET detector for breast cancer imaging

Abstract: Functional imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) may be a promising technique in conjunction with x-ray mammography for breast cancer patient management. Conventional whole body PET scanners provide metabolic images of breast cancer patients with several shortcomings related to the general-purpose nature of these systems. In whole body scanners, the detectors are typically 20-30 cm away from the breast or axilla, reducing sensitivity, and these scanners have relatively large detector elements (> 4 mm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
57
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3,4 However, special considerations on detector design and system architecture need to be taken into account given the demands for high spatial resolution and high photon sensitivity in order to detect early stages of breast cancer, which cannot be satisfied with the current clinical tomograph designs. [5][6][7][8][9] Breast-dedicated PET systems have recently demonstrated their clinical relevance, 10 whereas specialized system designs may be used to improve system performance. 11 Our group is developing a 1 mm 3 resolution PET scanner dedicated to breast imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 However, special considerations on detector design and system architecture need to be taken into account given the demands for high spatial resolution and high photon sensitivity in order to detect early stages of breast cancer, which cannot be satisfied with the current clinical tomograph designs. [5][6][7][8][9] Breast-dedicated PET systems have recently demonstrated their clinical relevance, 10 whereas specialized system designs may be used to improve system performance. 11 Our group is developing a 1 mm 3 resolution PET scanner dedicated to breast imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mot ivated by remaining challenges in diagnosis, staging, and management of breast cancer, small, high-resolution PET scanners dedicated to breast imaging have been investigated since the 1990s (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). Dedicated breast PET systems (positron emission mammography [PEM]) have spatial resolutions better than whole-body (WB) PET scanners by factors of 2-4 and are much smaller than WB PET scanners, allowing placement of the detectors close to the breast, thus increasing geometric detection efficiency for annihilation photons relative to WB PET.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another popular design that has been pursued by researchers is a parallel dual-planar geometry (Fig. 1b) [1], [5]. It is similar to using only the top and bottom detector banks in the rectangular PEM scanner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dedicated PET scanners, commonly referred to as positron emission mammography (PEM) cameras, are being developed to improve the cost effectiveness for detecting breast cancers [1][2][3][4][5]. These PEM scanners have special geometries that are different from the conventional circular design of whole body PET scanners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%