2021 5th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/iciccs51141.2021.9432336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Evaluation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Emotion Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the model is unable to distinguish between voluntary (deceptive) and involuntary (natural) facial expressions. CNN 44 model built with the help of Keras, TensorFlow, and OpenCV detects emotions in the face with high accuracy but takes much time to train the data in comparison to our method and predicts inaccurate results for the normal face (surprised) and when having a face with sweat and oils as shown in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Qualitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the model is unable to distinguish between voluntary (deceptive) and involuntary (natural) facial expressions. CNN 44 model built with the help of Keras, TensorFlow, and OpenCV detects emotions in the face with high accuracy but takes much time to train the data in comparison to our method and predicts inaccurate results for the normal face (surprised) and when having a face with sweat and oils as shown in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Qualitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The proposed model is compared with seven state-of-the-art models. CNN, 41 fisherface + HOG (one-versus-all approach), 42 CNNs and BOVW + local SVM, 43 CNN (three layers), 44 DCNN, 38 fusion feature (CNN + LBP + ORB) + ConvNet, 39 and mini-Xception 45 . The results are obtained by compiling the authors’ source code and with reference from their Google Drive.…”
Section: Experimentation and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, we evaluated the model's performance against FER-2013 to measure its resilience. Our proposed model demonstrated superior performance compared to models labeled as [34,[58][59][60][61][62][63][64], and [3], achieving accuracy improvements of 25 73.00% [3] 73.40% [56] 70.00% [57] 64.70% Model in this paper 91.71%…”
Section: Performing a Comparative Analysis Of The Proposed Model Agai...mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We conducted several experiments to evaluate the performance of the proposed FER model with other state-of-the-art methods, as shown in Table 9. To evaluate the model's robustness, we first compared the performance of our model with FER-2013; the proposed model surpassed an accuracy of 23.2%, 17.2%, 0.6%, and 2.42%, respectively, compared to the models of Arriaga et al [51], J. Li et al [52], Subramanian et al [53], and Borgalli et al [46]. We also assessed the robustness of our model using the CK+ dataset, where our model achieved a promising result compared to state-of-the-art methods.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of the Proposed Model With State-of-the...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arriaga et al [51] Mini-Xception 66.0 J. Li et al [52] CNN with Transfer Learning 72.0 Subramanian et al [53] Three Layer CNN architecture 88.6 Borgalli et al [46] Six We evaluated the performance of a proposed model in real time to compute the processing time of the proposed model over GPU, CPU and resource-constrained device (Jetson Nano). Jetson Nano is a small and powerful computer that runs multiple CNNs in parallel for different applications, such as recognition, segmentation, object detection, and speech processing.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%