2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13346-021-01089-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and development of topical liposomal formulations in a regulatory perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 137 publications
(129 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the reasons for the small number of nanoformulations on the market is the lack of robust in vitro studies with confirmed in vitro/in vivo correlations that can be used instead of clinical studies [ 169 ]. Currently, the risk/benefit ratio of the topical nanoformulations is evaluated on a case-by-case basis because of the lack of harmonized quality standards and regulatory frameworks [ 169 ]. Since clinical trials are not required for cosmetics, there is also a lack of evidence to support the claimed efficacy of cosmetic nanoformulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the reasons for the small number of nanoformulations on the market is the lack of robust in vitro studies with confirmed in vitro/in vivo correlations that can be used instead of clinical studies [ 169 ]. Currently, the risk/benefit ratio of the topical nanoformulations is evaluated on a case-by-case basis because of the lack of harmonized quality standards and regulatory frameworks [ 169 ]. Since clinical trials are not required for cosmetics, there is also a lack of evidence to support the claimed efficacy of cosmetic nanoformulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 7,8 ] For the aforementioned class of nanomedicines, references are available in the literature to further deepen the discussion of critical quality attributes and other regulatory requirements for assessing quality, efficacy, and safety profiles. [ 3,34 ]…”
Section: Regulatory Qualification Of Nanomedicine Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30,31] The proper classification of nanomedicine products affects the development toward marketing authorization of a first-inhuman product, the management of its postmarketing modifications as well as the development of therapeutically equivalent copies at the time of patent expiration of the reference nanomedicine. [32][33][34] Indeed, due to the inherent complexity, the equivalence of NBCDs and nanomedicine products cannot be assessed, as it occurs for generics, based on pharmaceutical equivalence and bioequivalence. [3,5] On the one hand, there is still the need to expand the arsenal of validated methodologies for the characterization of nanomedicines.…”
Section: Nonbiological Complex Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liposomes are generally spherical vesicles containing single or multiple phospholipid bilayers and an aqueous core. Conventional liposomes tend to be rigid and unyielding, rendering it hard for them to penetrate the SC as whole [ 134 ]. The encapsulated therapeutics are mostly deposited in superficial skin layers, being released via the exchange of the lipid component between liposomes and the SC.…”
Section: Novel Pharmaceutical Strategies For Skin Penetrationmentioning
confidence: 99%