Design and development of network simulator module for distributed mobility management protocol

Balfaqih, Zain

doi:10.1007/s12652-020-01764-y

Cited by 8 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The outcomes depend on both the simulated structures and the urban situations shown in the preceding section. Table 1 shows the default input variables obtained from References 10,11,16,24–26.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Handoff performance analysis of PMIPv6‐based distributed mobility management protocol‐urban scenario

Mahenthiran,

Muruganadam

2024

Concurrency and Computation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryMobility management allows the networks to track down a mobile user's location for sending datagrams and to retain the connection when the user changes its location points repeatedly. Whenever a node switches between one base station and another, the connectivity is maintained through a process called handoff management. For real‐time traffic implementations in wireless network communications, handover performance is essential. A mobile node is blocked from transmitting and receiving a datagram for a longer time as the handover delay increases. Unacceptable handover delays are common in real‐time communication services. To guarantee smooth connectivity and continuous provision of services, effective handoff methods are required. The handoff efficiency of network‐based distributed mobility management (DMM) is studied extensively in this article, along with a comparison to PMIPv6. We specifically investigate how handover delay, session recovery, and packet loss are influenced by cell radius. From the analytical and simulation findings this paper concludes that network‐based DMM performs better than PMIPv6.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Handoff performance analysis of PMIPv6‐based distributed mobility management protocol‐urban scenario

Mahenthiran,

Muruganadam

2024

Concurrency and Computation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…e. Packet loss and handover latency during a session: the number of packets lost during a session is another relevant measure [44]. This metric is based on handover latency [45], [46] and is determined as the total number of packets lost per mobile node throughout handover operations. A mobile node cannot accept packets until the handover process is completed.…”

Section: Performance Analysis Of Cmm and Dmm Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An overview of internet engineering task force mobility management protocols: approaches and its challenges

Mahenthiran

Dinakaran

2022

IJECE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

<p><span lang="EN-US">In recent years, internet protocol mobility management has become one of the most popular research areas in networking. Mobility management protocols are in charge of preserving continuing communications as a user roam between different networks. All existing internet protocols (IP), like MIPv6, and PMIPv6, rely on a centralized mobility anchor to control mobile node traffic and signaling. The disadvantages of centralized mobility management (CMM) include ineffectiveness in handling massive volumes of traffic, poor scalability, wasteful use of network resources, and packet delay. When CMM is required to handle mobile media, which demands a huge amount of information and frequently needs quality of services (QoS) such as session continuance and reduced latency, these difficulties become apparent. It drives the need for distributed mobility management protocol (DMM) systems to manage the growing amount of mobile data, the overwhelming of this is video communication. DMM approaches could be regarded as an innovative and effective method to deal with mobility. An overview of the CMM protocol and its drawbacks are analyzed. This study examines the various DMM protocol techniques and their performance metrics are compared to highlight similarities and differences. The study reveals the network-based DMM protocol improves overall handoff time and packet loss.</span></p>

show abstract

Performance Evaluation of Three Layer MIPv6 Architecture

Pokhrel

Dutta

Ghose

et al. 2022

Wireless Pers Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Design and development of network simulator module for distributed mobility management protocol

Cited by 8 publications

References 24 publications

Handoff performance analysis of PMIPv6‐based distributed mobility management protocol‐urban scenario

Handoff performance analysis of PMIPv6‐based distributed mobility management protocol‐urban scenario

An overview of internet engineering task force mobility management protocols: approaches and its challenges

Performance Evaluation of Three Layer MIPv6 Architecture

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About