2022
DOI: 10.3390/machines11010017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Determination of Aerodynamic Coefficients of a Tail-Sitter Aircraft by Means of CFD Numerical Simulation

Abstract: Vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft have become important aerial vehicles for various sectors, such as security, health, and commercial sectors. These vehicles are capable of operating in different flight modes, allowing for the covering of most flight requirements in most environments. A tail-sitter aircraft is a type of VTOL vehicle that has the ability to take off and land vertically on it elevators (its tail) or on some rigid support element that extends behind the trailing edge. Most of the tail… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The error graphs between both results are shown in Figure 17a,b. The oblique lines shown in the graphs are the upper and lower limits with a 25% error margin between the analytical and numerical studies [46]. In both figures, it can be seen that between 0 and 2500 m/s, the points stick to the side of the −25% line, this means that in this interval, the numerical results have a greater deviation compared to the analytical results.…”
Section: Comparison Of Analytical and Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The error graphs between both results are shown in Figure 17a,b. The oblique lines shown in the graphs are the upper and lower limits with a 25% error margin between the analytical and numerical studies [46]. In both figures, it can be seen that between 0 and 2500 m/s, the points stick to the side of the −25% line, this means that in this interval, the numerical results have a greater deviation compared to the analytical results.…”
Section: Comparison Of Analytical and Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The hydraulic model of the hydraulic turbine was built in ANSYS-SpaceClaim 2021 R1, which is a 3D high-efficiency modeling software [39]. This software abandons the feature tree concept of traditional CAD software, and can directly modify the model via dragging and other operations without considering the creation process of the model.…”
Section: Hydraulic Modeling and Meshingmentioning
confidence: 99%