3rd IET International Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives (PEMD 2006) 2006
DOI: 10.1049/cp:20060195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and construction of a magnetic fault current limiter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A slightly different approach using only one permanent magnet was presented by Iwdiara et al (1999). Calman et al (2001) MFCL employing a permanent magnet having a large square hysteresis was presented in a previous study (Rasolonjanahary et al, 2005). During the first peak of a fault, the large fault current cycles around this large hysteresis loop, thus dissipating large amount of energy, which would otherwise pass into the fault.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A slightly different approach using only one permanent magnet was presented by Iwdiara et al (1999). Calman et al (2001) MFCL employing a permanent magnet having a large square hysteresis was presented in a previous study (Rasolonjanahary et al, 2005). During the first peak of a fault, the large fault current cycles around this large hysteresis loop, thus dissipating large amount of energy, which would otherwise pass into the fault.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Many kinds of FCLs have been developed over the past several decades [16]. These can be classified into three main groups depending on their fundamental technology: 1) superconducting FCLs [5,6], [17], magnetic FCLs [18], and solid-state FCLs [19]. Alternatively, classification by impedance is possible, in which case the main classes are inductive FCLs and resistive FCLs.…”
Section: Inductive Fault Current Limitermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples of non-superconducting schemes are arc-type current limiting, 3 commutating fault currents to limiting elements via high-speed switches, 4 and utilization of saturable reactors. 5,6 On the other hand, this study proposes a method to limit fault currents in a transformer's secondary circuit by switching magnetic circuits in transformer. 7 As compared to schemes based on switching in electrical circuits, the proposed method does not involve arcs; this promises labor saving in maintenance related to wear, poor contacts, etc., as well as a long cycle life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%