1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4495(98)00038-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and characteristics of a differential Helmholtz resonant photoacoustic cell for infrared gas detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
54
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…8 displays the frequency response of the cell obtained using a 2372 nm DFB laser and CH 4 as an absorbing species. The Helmholtz resonance is observed at 2.6 kHz with a quality factor Q ∼ = 25, which is comparable to our knowledge to the best values reported in the literature for Helmholtz resonator used in PAS (see for example [5][6][7]). Similar performances have been obtained when exciting the resonance with a loud-speaker.…”
Section: Novel Compact Helmholtz-based Pa Cellsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 displays the frequency response of the cell obtained using a 2372 nm DFB laser and CH 4 as an absorbing species. The Helmholtz resonance is observed at 2.6 kHz with a quality factor Q ∼ = 25, which is comparable to our knowledge to the best values reported in the literature for Helmholtz resonator used in PAS (see for example [5][6][7]). Similar performances have been obtained when exciting the resonance with a loud-speaker.…”
Section: Novel Compact Helmholtz-based Pa Cellsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A value C exp = 660 [Pa W −1 cm] is obtained for our Helmholtz-based PA cell. This is approximately one order of magnitude smaller than the value reported for the differential Helmholtz resonator from Zéninari et al [5], which may be explained by the 10-fold higher operation frequency of our cell, since the cell constant varies as 1/f 2 according to Eqs. (3) and (4).…”
Section: Ammonia Sensingcontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Open cells presented in the literature [8][9][10][11] are susceptible to external acoustic noise penetration, which can seriously limit the sensitivity of the photoacoustic instrument [5]. Solving this problem may allow for wider use of this kind of photoacoustic cells in continuous flow measurements [7,[12][13][14]. So far, the best values of the external acoustic noise suppression obtained in such cells were reported at a level of approximately 40 dB to 50 dB [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where α is the light absorption coefficient, P is the light power, f is the light intensity modulation frequency, and V is the volume of the cell [17,18]. To amplify the photoacoustic signal, the modulation frequency of the light beam should be adjusted to an acoustic resonance of the cell [4,14,15,19].…”
Section: Open Photoacoustic Helmholtz Cellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, due to separation of the cavities by a narrow duct, Helmholtz cells allow for good isolation of the microphone from the sample and the light beam. In single-cavity cells, where such isolation does not exist, the incident light beam can result in an increase of the background noise [15,18,20,21]. The mechanism of photoacoustic [7] signal triggering in the Helmholtz resonator is quite different from that in the other kinds of resonance cells (such as those with the standing wave resonance) [14,22]; the sample is illuminated by the light of the frequency in the sample's absorption spectrum.…”
Section: Open Photoacoustic Helmholtz Cellmentioning
confidence: 99%