2009
DOI: 10.1198/tech.2009.0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Analysis of Two-Level Factorial Experiments With Partial Replication

Abstract: In a two-level factorial experiment, we consider construction of parallel-flats designs with two identical parallel flats that allow estimation of a set of specified possibly active effects and the pure error variance. A set of sufficient conditions is presented for the designs to be D-optimal for the specified effects, assuming that the other effects are negligible, over the class of competing parallel-flats designs. In addition, an algorithm is developed to generate the D-optimal designs with a choice of fle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A design is said to be D‐optimal for boldβ over a specific class of designs, if its information matrix achieves the maximal determinant among all the competing designs. Note that the D‐optimality criterion is also used by Liao & Chai () and Tsai, Liao & Chai () for selecting partially replicated design points with respect to a user‐specified boldβ, which consists of not only the constant term and all the main effects, but also some two‐factor or higher order interactions. Under the assumption that the full‐effect model is the true model, the expectation of 4βˆ=false(boldXTX)1boldXTY, the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) for boldβ, is given by Efalse(4boldβˆfalse)=boldβ+boldC2β2++boldCnβn, where boldCj=false(boldXTX)1boldXTboldXj is the alias or bias matrix.…”
Section: A Compound Criterion and Its Justificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A design is said to be D‐optimal for boldβ over a specific class of designs, if its information matrix achieves the maximal determinant among all the competing designs. Note that the D‐optimality criterion is also used by Liao & Chai () and Tsai, Liao & Chai () for selecting partially replicated design points with respect to a user‐specified boldβ, which consists of not only the constant term and all the main effects, but also some two‐factor or higher order interactions. Under the assumption that the full‐effect model is the true model, the expectation of 4βˆ=false(boldXTX)1boldXTY, the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) for boldβ, is given by Efalse(4boldβˆfalse)=boldβ+boldC2β2++boldCnβn, where boldCj=false(boldXTX)1boldXTboldXj is the alias or bias matrix.…”
Section: A Compound Criterion and Its Justificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, an essential consideration is to request the augmented design as efficient as possible in estimating all the main effects with respect to a variance‐based optimality criterion. The reader is referred to Liao & Chai (), Butler & Ramos (), Liao & Chai (), Dasgupta, Jacroux & SahaRay (), Chatzopoulos, Kolyva‐Machera & Chatterjee () and Tsai, Liao & Chai () for this design issue. Specifically, Liao & Chai () explored the partially replicated designs in a class of parallel‐flats designs, such that they are D‐optimal for a set of user‐specified possibly active effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, their simulation study showed that the 48-run designs are plentiful in which each two-factor interaction is forced to include one or two of a limited number of specific factors. More recently, Liao and Chai (2009) investigated PFDs with repeated runs for estimating a user-specified requirement set of factorial effects. Also, Tang and Zhou (2009) considered two-level orthogonal arrays that allow estimation of the grand mean, all main effects and certain important two-factor interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a practical compromise is to carry out a partial replication. Partially replicated designs usually work well regardless of the effect sparsity, see Liao and Chai (2009). Dykstra (1959) proposed some high-resolution designs including repeated runs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liao and Chai (2004) first investigated the parallel-flats designs with a replicated flat. Most recently, Liao and Chai (2009) proposed a set of sufficient conditions and an algorithm for constructing D-optimal designs over the class of parallel-flats designs. However, there are still some limitations in their study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%