2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1413-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and analysis of multiple choice feeding preference data

Abstract: Traditional analyses of feeding experiments that test consumer preference for an array of foods suffer from several defects. We have modified the experimental design to incorporate into a multivariate analysis the variance due to autogenic change in control replicates. Our design allows the multiple foods to be physically paired with their control counterparts. This physical proximity of the multiple food choices in control/experimental pairs ensures that the variance attributable to external environmental fac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a total of 30 prey individuals and one predator per aquaria). Control treatments were stocked with the same prey density but without predators to provide a baseline of prey survival and behavior in predator's absence (Prince et al, 2004). Fish density used in the treatments mimicked natural densities of juvenile fish in the lagoons and littoral areas of the Paraná River (Pelicice et al, 2005;Bulla, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a total of 30 prey individuals and one predator per aquaria). Control treatments were stocked with the same prey density but without predators to provide a baseline of prey survival and behavior in predator's absence (Prince et al, 2004). Fish density used in the treatments mimicked natural densities of juvenile fish in the lagoons and littoral areas of the Paraná River (Pelicice et al, 2005;Bulla, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data treatment was descriptive, since multiple-choice experiments are still the target of much discussion in the literature (PETERSON; RENAUD, 1989;ROA, 1992;LOCKWOOD, 1998;RAFFA et al, 2002;PRINCE et al, 2004). Data from experimental and autogenic controls were compared by t test analysis.…”
Section: Statistical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In laboratory tests T. ventricosus preferred the alga Dictyota cervicornis over seagrass (T. testudinum) and the alga Galaxaura oblongata, but exhibited no preference between the latter two (Prince et al 2004). In our experiment, T. ventricosus that were fed several species of macroalgae grew three times faster than urchins fed seagrass alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%