2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(03)00082-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and analysis of an Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae transmission experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
82
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
82
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an important contrast to efficacy studies in which it is susceptibility that is principally tested, and not the combined effect (Springer et al, 2001;Roesler et al, 2004;Tanaka et al, 2010). A similar approach has been used in previous transmission experiments with other pathogens (Laevens et al, 1998;Dewulf et al, 2001;Velthuis et al, 2003;Heres et al, 2004;Meyns et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important contrast to efficacy studies in which it is susceptibility that is principally tested, and not the combined effect (Springer et al, 2001;Roesler et al, 2004;Tanaka et al, 2010). A similar approach has been used in previous transmission experiments with other pathogens (Laevens et al, 1998;Dewulf et al, 2001;Velthuis et al, 2003;Heres et al, 2004;Meyns et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rather 'unnatural' infection process including the inoculation via both the intratracheal and the intramuscular routes was set up in order to get a homogeneous and comparable population of infectious pigs whatever the group (within-or betweenpen transmission). Secondary infected pigs used as seeders to infect susceptible ones as in a transmission experiment with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae [32] would have been relevant because it would have reproduced, in a more natural way, infections occurring within a farm. However, the addition of such supplementary phases would have led to a necessary limitation of the duration of the contact trial per se because the required space per pig had to be maintained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will all lead to overestimation of R 0 . This can be prevented by setting up a so-called extended transmission experiment in which, as soon as the majority of the contact piglets pick up the contact infection, the inoculated piglets are replaced by new contact piglets [28]. However, differences in age between the infectious contact piglet and the new contact piglet and the resulting behavioural differences might affect the contact pattern and amount of stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%