2018 7th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/biorob.2018.8487195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Advancements Toward a Wearable Pediatric Robotic Knee Exoskeleton for Overground Gait Rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Limitations in this proposed design and study include the simplicity of the FSM used for this experiment (two state FSM). It would be beneficial to test the robustness of NMES and exoskeleton assistance synchronization in more complex cases, such as a five-state FSM and adaptive controllers which we have recently developed for use with motorized assistance [42]. Testing the NMESexoskeleton system on only one participant presents another limitation in making conclusions about its potential clinical effectiveness in other patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Limitations in this proposed design and study include the simplicity of the FSM used for this experiment (two state FSM). It would be beneficial to test the robustness of NMES and exoskeleton assistance synchronization in more complex cases, such as a five-state FSM and adaptive controllers which we have recently developed for use with motorized assistance [42]. Testing the NMESexoskeleton system on only one participant presents another limitation in making conclusions about its potential clinical effectiveness in other patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NMES was triggered by the exoskeleton controller to deliver stimulation to the quadriceps muscles throughout stance phase, i.e., when the FSR value was above the tuned threshold indicating foot contact with the ground. The NIH pediatric exoskeleton is a lightweight (3.2 kg), modular device based on the architecture of a knee-ankle-foot orthosis [14,15,20] designed to provide motorized assistance at the knee joint to augment knee extension during walking, and thus is specifically designed for rehabilitation of crouch gait in children with CP [14,42]. In this study, however, the motors provided only enough torque to compensate for the friction and inertia of the exoskeleton and thus were not actively assisting knee extension.…”
Section: Pediatric Robotic Exoskeletonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exoskeleton controller (Figure 1(b)) has been previously designed. [5][6][7] The exoskeleton has two In Standby Mode, the goal is to be transparent to the wearer and therefore only minimal assistive torque is provided to compensate for device friction and inertia but no walking assistance is provided. In Walking Mode, the user can select from three different torquebased assistance strategies: 1) constant torque; 2) impedance-based control that tracks a target knee trajectory; or 3) real-time adaptive control.…”
Section: Design Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5 Our recent efforts have expanded the assistive capabilities of the exoskeleton to include three different options; constant torque assistance, 5 target trajectory tracking with impedance-based control, or real-time adaptive control. 6 , 7 The overall goal of our research is to develop a wearable exoskeleton to provide gait training optimized for each individual that can be performed outside of the laboratory or clinical setting. In general, wearable pediatric exoskeletons are an active area of research with several recent studies in addition to our own demonstrating new systems designed to improve pediatric gait and facilitate gait training in a wide variety of movement disorders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also recommended that the developed controllers should do the same as a therapist exercises of gait scheme [24]. In this context, two controllers are proposed, a classical PD controller [25] and a robust sliding mode controller [26], in order to evaluate and compare their robustness towards parameter variations.…”
Section: Control Related Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%