The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/icra48506.2021.9561399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DESERTS: DElay-tolerant SEmi-autonomous Robot Teleoperation for Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other similar examples include Refs. [21,22,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61].…”
Section: Modelling Network Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other similar examples include Refs. [21,22,[48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61].…”
Section: Modelling Network Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches have been shown to give good results in terms of performance. The advanced methods for predictive display include the use of generative AI methods for pixel synthesis (e.g., GANs) [ 46 , 129 , 130 ], pixel transformation and time-series methods (e.g., LSTMs) [ 61 ], and probabilistic models [ 8 ]. Alternate methods that reduce the burden on computation and the interface can be considered, such as motion and content separation and extracting higher-level features in the visual feedback.…”
Section: Latency Mitigation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tele-operations such as plant decommissioning, astrospace exploration and remote surgery [1], the exchange between position instructions from the master side and the haptic feedback from the slave side allows an operator to realistically conduct complicated tasks through a slave robot in a remote environment [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing studies can be categorized based on user intention recognition techniques, task performance metrics, and decision-making algorithms. User intention recognition is performed either by model based methods [3], [6], [11], data-driven methods [1], [2], [7]- [10] or combinations of both types of methods [4]. It is worth noting that user intention recognition accuracy varies between 20% and 95%, which was not considered in some references.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%