2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Descriptive pilot study of vividness and temporal equivalence during motor imagery training after quadriplegia

Abstract: This is the first study reporting improvement in functional equivalence during an MI training program that improved tenodesis grasp in individuals with C6-C7 quadriplegia. We recommend that clinical MI programs focus primarily on vividness and suggest that feedback about movement duration could potentially improve temporal equivalence, which could in turn lead to further improvement in PP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The VAS has been widely used for subjective assessment of pain (Bijur et al, 2001 ; Suso-Martí et al, 2019 ) where patients mark the degree of pain on a 100-mm horizontal line. Recently, the VAS has been used for assessing the vividness of MI (Mateo et al, 2018 ). In this study, subjects marked a location on a 100-mm horizontal line, the two ends of which were labeled “0 = none at all” and “100 = very highly vivid image,” according to the vividness of the imagery they experienced.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The VAS has been widely used for subjective assessment of pain (Bijur et al, 2001 ; Suso-Martí et al, 2019 ) where patients mark the degree of pain on a 100-mm horizontal line. Recently, the VAS has been used for assessing the vividness of MI (Mateo et al, 2018 ). In this study, subjects marked a location on a 100-mm horizontal line, the two ends of which were labeled “0 = none at all” and “100 = very highly vivid image,” according to the vividness of the imagery they experienced.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, as supplementary data for accuracy of results, it is considered important to show the subject’s MI ability to form and control accurate mental images of movement and the quality and vividness of their image of the motor act (Guillot and Collet, 2005 ; Sharma et al, 2006 ). In particular, the Movement Imagery Questionnaire (MIQ; Malouin et al, 2007 ), Vividness of MIQ (VMIQ; Isaac et al, 1986 ), and Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ; Malouin et al, 2007 ) are used to measure the subject’s MI ability, whereas the visual analogue scale (VAS; Mateo et al, 2018 ) and Likert scale (Ruffino et al, 2017 ) describe the subjective perception of how clear and vivid the MI was. In the present study, we defined “MI ability assessment” as that which evaluates the subject’s MI ability with a task that is different from the task to be learned in MI training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding has been replicated in other sporting contexts such as golf (Williams et al, 2013b) and synchronized skating (Cumming and Ste-Marie, 2001). More recently, Mateo et al (2018) reported that a 5 week MI training program for people with quadriplegia improved self-rated aspects of their imagery experience (namely, its vividness). Unfortunately, this study was descriptive rather than experimental in nature and did not use a psychometric measure of MI ability both before and after MI training.…”
Section: Mip and Changes In MI Abilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another key concept of this theory is the assumption that the mental representation of a specific movement and its actual execution involve cooperating (sub-)cortical networks in the brain (Jeannerod and Decety, 1995;Decety, 1996). Several neuroimaging studies have provided evidence supporting this theory (Lotze et al, 2002;Lacourse et al, 2005;Miller et al, 2010;Galdo-Alvarez et al, 2016;Mateo et al, 2018). Consequently, MI practice has been suggested to facilitate the acquisition of new motor skills, the improvement of already existing motor skills and the relearning of motor skills following a brain injury, such as stroke (e.g., Robin et al, 2007;Wei and Luo, 2010;Frank et al, 2014;Kraeutner et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%