2018
DOI: 10.7146/torture.v25i2.109673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Descriptive, inferential, functional outcome data on 9,025 torture survivors over six years in the United States

Abstract: Background: The National Consortium of Torture Treatment Programs conducted a large voluntary research project among torture rehabilitation centers in the United States (US). Its goal is to fill the void in the literature on demographic and diagnostic data of torture survivors across a large country. Methods: Twenty-three centers across the US collaborated over six years, utilizing training and making decisions via conference calls and webinars. A data use agreement signed by all the participating center… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, only approximately 10% of those notified about the study volunteered to participate. Although participants were broadly representative of asylee torture survivors in the U.S. in terms of countries of origin and general demographics (Member Centers of the National Consortium of Torture Treatment Programs, 2015), they may have had more positive views about their testimony experiences, and felt more comfortable speaking about testimony, than those who did not participate. Additionally, the primary researcher in this study was an outsider to the cultures and experiences of the participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, only approximately 10% of those notified about the study volunteered to participate. Although participants were broadly representative of asylee torture survivors in the U.S. in terms of countries of origin and general demographics (Member Centers of the National Consortium of Torture Treatment Programs, 2015), they may have had more positive views about their testimony experiences, and felt more comfortable speaking about testimony, than those who did not participate. Additionally, the primary researcher in this study was an outsider to the cultures and experiences of the participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%