2020
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.11244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Descriptive Evaluation of Male Emergency Department Patients in the United States With Gonorrhea and Chlamydia

Abstract: Introduction Sexually transmitted infections are commonly tested for in the emergency department (ED), but diagnostic test results are often unavailable during the clinical encounter. Methods We retrospectively reviewed health records of 3,132 men ≥18 years that had an emergency department visit in northeast Ohio between April 18, 2014 and March 7, 2017. All subjects underwent testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis. Independent t-tests and chi-square analys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the existing dataset to explore our clinical question and only included men in the analysis. Analyses from the dataset have previously been published [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the existing dataset to explore our clinical question and only included men in the analysis. Analyses from the dataset have previously been published [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our study, only those who underwent nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for gonorrhea, chlamydia, or trichomonas, or who had a vaginal wet preparation for trichomonas were included in this analysis. Manuscripts have already been published from this dataset [16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Te data set contained retrospective data extracted from the electronic medical records by an institutional information technology team. Data from this data set have been published previously, including how the data set was created [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%