1999
DOI: 10.1007/10703163_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Descriptive Complexity, Lower Bounds and Linear Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Descriptive complexity measures the syntactic complexity of formulae that express a certain property, instead of its computation complexity. See [5] and [9] for more general discussions on this theory. A fundamental result in this area is the well-known Fagin's theorem, which states that a property is in the class NP (non-deterministic polynomial time computability) if and only if it is describable as an existential second-order logical sentence (see [3]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Descriptive complexity measures the syntactic complexity of formulae that express a certain property, instead of its computation complexity. See [5] and [9] for more general discussions on this theory. A fundamental result in this area is the well-known Fagin's theorem, which states that a property is in the class NP (non-deterministic polynomial time computability) if and only if it is describable as an existential second-order logical sentence (see [3]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , t n of strings, decide whether 2 is the lexicographically sorted version of 1 ) which are conjectured not to belong to DTIME(n) (see [24]). In the present paper we show the following analogue of the result of [11]: One area of research in Finite Model Theory considers extensions of logics which allow invariant uses of some auxiliary relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , t n of strings, decide whether 2 is the lexicographically sorted version of 1 ) which are conjectured not to belong to DTIME(n) (see [28]). In the present paper we show the following analogue of the result of [13]: Theorem 1.2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%