2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2010.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description of the iliolumbar ligament for computer-assisted reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the force vector applied to the pelvic ligaments causing APCII is dramatically different from the force vector applied in the two‐leg stance. Taking these findings and the fiber orientation of the ligaments into account, it can be concluded that the pelvic ligaments are loaded in a highly unphysiological manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, the force vector applied to the pelvic ligaments causing APCII is dramatically different from the force vector applied in the two‐leg stance. Taking these findings and the fiber orientation of the ligaments into account, it can be concluded that the pelvic ligaments are loaded in a highly unphysiological manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, pelvic anatomy is known to differ dramatically and to be gender‐dependent, which has to be taken into account when driving clinically relevant conclusions from our data. Second, as the ligaments of the pelvic ring are known to be age and gender dependent, they will possibly be impaired to an individual extent in APC. The given computer model may therefore be regarded as an individual model with individual results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fracturing occurred in all male cases but in only one female case. Male and female pelves are known to differ with regard to the bones and the connecting ligaments (Hammer et al, , ; Steinke et al, ). S3L could also be gender‐dependent, considering that the male sacrum is smaller than the female (Fick et al, ; Baumgärtel and Kühn, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%