1978
DOI: 10.21236/ada059743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description of the Air Force Maintenance Training Device Acquisition and Utilization Processes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, nuclear times are more likely a better data set than commercial or industrial data. A good set of nuclear equipment maintenance times is found in Hannaman (1978), and some of those times are cited here. Some generalized major maintenance act time ranges were also given in the WASH-1400 Reactor Safety Study (NRC, 1975), such as valves, 1 to 350 hours with an average time of 24 hours, and instruments 0.25 to 72 hours, with an average time of 7 hours.…”
Section: Component Failure Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, nuclear times are more likely a better data set than commercial or industrial data. A good set of nuclear equipment maintenance times is found in Hannaman (1978), and some of those times are cited here. Some generalized major maintenance act time ranges were also given in the WASH-1400 Reactor Safety Study (NRC, 1975), such as valves, 1 to 350 hours with an average time of 24 hours, and instruments 0.25 to 72 hours, with an average time of 7 hours.…”
Section: Component Failure Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%