2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2023.01.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description of phenotype, grain quality, molecular fingerprinting, and biodiversity using DNA barcoding of some elite rice genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other abiotic stress responsiveness of rice, some other molecular markers like SSR, ISSR, SNP were used in the rice landrace population (Ganie et al, 2016(Ganie et al, , 2014Karmakar et al, 2012;Meena et al, 2023;Roychowdhury et al, 2013). SCoT markerbased analysis is better than other frequently used molecular markers since primer creation does not need genomic sequence information (Omar et al, 2023) (Omar et al 2023). SCoT markers also have larger polymorphism rates than SSRs, making them better at distinguishing closely related genotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In other abiotic stress responsiveness of rice, some other molecular markers like SSR, ISSR, SNP were used in the rice landrace population (Ganie et al, 2016(Ganie et al, , 2014Karmakar et al, 2012;Meena et al, 2023;Roychowdhury et al, 2013). SCoT markerbased analysis is better than other frequently used molecular markers since primer creation does not need genomic sequence information (Omar et al, 2023) (Omar et al 2023). SCoT markers also have larger polymorphism rates than SSRs, making them better at distinguishing closely related genotypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCoT marker-based analysis presents distinct advantages over other widely used molecular markers like SSR and SNP in rice as it does not require prior knowledge of genomic sequences for primer design, making them particularly valuable for non-model species or less studied rice varieties (Omar et al, 2023). Furthermore, SCoT markers offer higher polymorphism rates compared to SSRs, enabling more accurate discrimination between closely related genotypes, and enhancing the resolution in genetic diversity studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In relation to the responsiveness of rice under other abiotic stresses, some other molecular markers, like SSR, ISSR, SNP, were used in the rice landrace population [13,14,34,36,52]. SCoT-marker-based analysis is better than other frequently used molecular markers since primer creation does not need genomic sequence information [23]. SCoT markers also have larger polymorphism rates than SSRs, making them better at distinguishing closely related genotypes.…”
Section: Scot Marker-assisted Genetic Analysis and Genotypic Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCoT markers are a type of molecular marker used in crop genetic analysis and are based on the polymorphism on short ATG start codon region of genes, making them valuable tools for studying genetic diversity, population structure, and phylogenetic relationships among different rice varieties with stress-tolerance properties [22]. SCoT-marker-based analysis presents distinct advantages over other widely used molecular markers, like SSR and SNP, in rice as it does not require prior knowledge of genomic sequences for primer design, making them particularly valuable for non-model species or less-studied rice varieties [23]. Furthermore, SCoT markers offer higher polymorphism rates compared to SSRs, enabling more accurate discrimination between closely related genotypes and enhancing the resolution in genetic diversity studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%