Description of noncovalent interactions involving π‐system with high precision: An assessment of RPA, MP2, and DFT‐D methods

Abstract

Efficient approaches with high precision are essential for understanding the formation and stability of noncovalent interaction complexes. Here, 21 noncovalent interaction complexes involving π‐system are selected and grouped in three subsets according to ETS–NOCV method: dispersion‐dominated, electrostatic‐dominated, and mixed. We mainly focus on examining the performance of random‐phase approximation (RPA) on these π systems. The tested RPA‐based method includes standard RPA and its variants including the related single excitations (SEs), renormalized single excitations (rSEs), second‐order screened exchange (SOSEX), and the renormalized second‐order perturbation theory (rPT2). The routine second‐order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) and three popular DFT‐D functionals (M06‐2X‐D3, ωB97XD, and PBE‐D3(BJ)) are also assessed for comparison. In this work, besides the calculation of interaction energies at Dunning‐type aug‐cc‐pVDZ and aug‐cc‐pVTZ basis set, we also present a larger database of interaction energies calculated using MP2 and RPA methods with Dunning‐type aug‐cc‐pVQZ basis set. An accurate CCSD(T)/CBS scheme is used to provide benchmark database. In addition to the high‐level results, we also provide potential energy surfaces (PES) of different interaction type. Among all the tested methods, MP2 has a satisfactory performance on electrostatic‐dominated and mixed‐type systems, except for dispersion‐dominated systems. DFT‐D functionals, especially ωB97XD functional, has a balanced performance across all the tested systems. Importantly, for RPA‐based methods, the calculation accuracy can be dramatically improved by taking into account SE or exchange effects, especially in the mixed complexes. We conclude that rPT2 among all the test RPA‐based methods gives an overall satisfactory performance across different interaction types. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cl⋅⋅⋅Cl Halogen Bonding: Nature and Effect of Substituent at Electron Donor Cl atom

“…The geometries of the R−Cl electron donors and its complexes with ClF molecule were optimized using Density Functional Theory (DFT) based ωB97X−D method in conjunction with the aug‐cc‐pVTZ basis set. The reliability of dispersion corrected ωB97X−D functional for the study of halogen bond and other weak interactions has been established in many recent works . Recently, Wong et.…”

Unveiling the Potential of B3O3 Nanoflake as Effective Transporter for the Antiviral Drug Favipiravir: Density Functional Theory Analysis

“…Geometric analysis utilized the ωB97XD functional in conjunction with the 6-31+G(d,p) basis set. The ωB97XD functional is a hybrid and long-range separated functional with additional dispersion correction, and is popular due to its treatment of non-covalent interactions [55][56][57]. This correction factor accounts for weak London dispersion forces and ensures the production of accurate Internal descriptors including the oscillating strength and excitation energies are calculated to understand the reason for the change in wavelength.…”

Exploring the Limits of Second- and Third-Order Møller–Plesset Perturbation Theories for Noncovalent Interactions: Revisiting MP2.5 and Assessing the Importance of Regularization and Reference Orbitals

“…We refer the interested reader to ref , which includes an extensive comparison of many DFT functionals and various NCI data sets. However, approximate exchange–correlation functionals incorporate many empirical parameters, which are often trained and/or tested on these benchmark sets. ,, Alternatively, there are promising NCI results obtained by employing the random phase approximation (RPA) as a correction to DFT, − as well as active development and testing of further corrections to RPA. − However, we note that radical systems or charged systems can still pose a problem for density functionals due to the self-interaction error (SIE). ,, …”