1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf01293338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description of low-lying vibrational and two-quasiparticle states in164Dy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference [64], using the boson-expansion method, obtained B(E2)↑ = 0.130 e 2 b 2 in 154 Sm, a value somewhat larger than ours. Soloviev et al [65,66] Those transition probabilities are close to the experimental data (0.116 e 2 b 2 in 178 Hf [65]), and the fit of the interaction meant that energies were also reproduced well. See also Ref.…”
Section: Comparison With Older Calculations Of γ-Vibrational Statessupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reference [64], using the boson-expansion method, obtained B(E2)↑ = 0.130 e 2 b 2 in 154 Sm, a value somewhat larger than ours. Soloviev et al [65,66] Those transition probabilities are close to the experimental data (0.116 e 2 b 2 in 178 Hf [65]), and the fit of the interaction meant that energies were also reproduced well. See also Ref.…”
Section: Comparison With Older Calculations Of γ-Vibrational Statessupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Early work on vibrations in rare-earth nuclei often made use of the pairing-plus-QQ (quadrupolequadrupole) Hamiltonian, both in the (Q)RPA [59][60][61][62][63] and in approximations that went beyond the QRPA order, e. g. [64][65][66]. Single-particle energies were usually obtained from the Nilsson potential, with slight shifts to improve phenomenology, and the strength of the QQ interactions was modified slightly from the self-consistent value so as to reproduce the energies of the γ-vibrational states.…”
Section: Comparison With Older Calculations Of γ-Vibrational Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [66], using the boson-expansion method, obtained B(E2)↑ = 0.130 e 2 b 2 in 154 Sm, a value somewhat larger than ours. Soloviev et al [67,68] used the quasiparticle-phonon nuclear model, which includes two-phonon couplings, and obtained B(E2) ↑ = 0.127 e 2 b 2 ( 168 Er), 0.042 e 2 b 2 ( 172 Yb), and 0.122 e 2 b 2 ( 178 Hf). Those transition probabilities are close to the experimental data (0.116 e 2 b 2 in 178 Hf [67]), and the fit of the interaction meant that energies were also reproduced well.…”
Section: Comparison With Older Calculations Of γ-Vibrational Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early work on vibrations in rare-earth nuclei often made use of the pairing-plus-QQ (quadrupolequadrupole) Hamiltonian, both in the (Q)RPA [61][62][63][64][65] and in approximations that went beyond the QRPA order, e. g. [66][67][68]. Single-particle energies were usually obtained from the Nilsson potential, with slight shifts to improve phenomenology, and the strength of the QQ interactions was modified slightly from the self-consistent value so as to reproduce the energies of the γ-vibrational states.…”
Section: Comparison With Older Calculations Of γ-Vibrational Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These states and their anharmonicities are of a great interest since they provide a stringent test of nuclear models. For example, the Quasiphonon Nuclear Model predicts no K = 0 + double-γ vibrations below 2.5 MeV in 166 Er [10]. A study of double-γ vibrations using the intrinsic-state formalism of the Interacting Boson Model (IBM) has revealed that large anharmonicities can only be obtained for a finite number of bosons combined with a three-body term in the Hamiltonian that can induce triaxiality [11].…”
Section: 60ev 2160fwmentioning
confidence: 99%