2009
DOI: 10.1080/09670260903225431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description ofConticribra tricircularis, a new genus and species of Thalassiosirales, with a discussion on its relationship to other continuous cribra species ofThalassiosiraCleve (Bacillariophyta) and its freshwater origin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are approximately 100 living Thalassiosira species, some of these are better thought of as belonging to Thalassiosira sensu lato. For example, some are characterised by valve face undulation that may not correspond to a broad concept of Thalassiosira (Julius & Tanimura 2001;, and others were recently transferred to genera such as Roundia Makarova and Takanoa Makarova (Makarova 1994) and Shionodiscus Alverson, Kang & Theriot and Conticribra Stachura-Suchoples & Williams (Alverson et al 2006;Stachura-Suchoples & Williams 2009). Nevertheless, many Thalassiosira species still have an ambiguous status, as it is difficult to recognise the problematic taxa from over 100 species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are approximately 100 living Thalassiosira species, some of these are better thought of as belonging to Thalassiosira sensu lato. For example, some are characterised by valve face undulation that may not correspond to a broad concept of Thalassiosira (Julius & Tanimura 2001;, and others were recently transferred to genera such as Roundia Makarova and Takanoa Makarova (Makarova 1994) and Shionodiscus Alverson, Kang & Theriot and Conticribra Stachura-Suchoples & Williams (Alverson et al 2006;Stachura-Suchoples & Williams 2009). Nevertheless, many Thalassiosira species still have an ambiguous status, as it is difficult to recognise the problematic taxa from over 100 species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fultoportula-bearing genus Conticribra Stachura-Suchoples et Williams (2009: 482) was recently established to accommodate C. tricircularis Stachura-Suchoples et Williams (2009: 479) and three species of Thalassiosira (Stachura-Suchoples & Williams 2009). The genus is characterized by the presence of loculate areolae with (semi-) continuous cribra; a non-plicate valve face; and the rimoportula located on the valve mantle, replacing a fultoportula The presence of valve face fultoportulae constitutes the distinguishing character between living Conticribra species and fossil Conticribra species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Stachura-Suchoples & Williams 2009). The genus Conticribra comprises four species, namely, two fossil species-C.tricircularis and C. nevadica (Khursevich et VanLandingham) Stachura-Suchoples et Williams (2009: 482; basionym: Thalassiosira nevadica Khursevich & VanLandingham 1993: 3902)-and two extant species-C. guillardii (Hasle) Stachura-Suchoples et Williams (2009: 482; basionym: Thalassiosira guillardii Hasle 1978: 274) and C. weissflogii (Grunow) Stachura-Suchoples et Williams (2009: 482; basionym: Micropodiscus weissflogii Grunow in Van Heurck 1885: 210 1 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 F). The species was described by HASLE (1978) from a brackish water locality (Helsinki, Gulf of Finland) and was transferred to the Conticribra genus by STACHURA-SUCHOPLES and WILLIAMS (2009). Additional data were published about its morphology by MAKAROVA et al (1979), KISS et al (1984), GENKAL (1992), TRIGUEROS et al (2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%