1990
DOI: 10.1002/1098-108x(199003)9:2<129::aid-eat2260090202>3.0.co;2-h
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Description of eating-disordered, psychiatric, and normal women along cognitive and psychodynamic dimensions

Abstract: To evaluate various psychological constructs used in formulations of anorexia and bulimia nervosa, we compared 76 eating‐disordered, 20 psychiatric, and 24 normal women on measures of irrational cognitions, object‐relations disturbances, and defense styles. The eating‐disordered groups exhibited more disturbance on all measures than normals and many pathological elevations relative to psychiatric controls. Despite these differences, common qualitative features were identified in all patient groups, suggesting … Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
52
10
6
1

Citation Types

7
38
0
1

Year Published

Range
1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
59
4

Relationship

6
57

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 63 publications

(46 citation statements)
references

References 39 publications

7
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…They began therapy completely fused and identified with their inner critics, what they often called ‘my eating disorder voice’. This experience is consistent with existing literature, which has demonstrated that individuals with eating disorders are often highly self‐critical, a characteristic that works to maintain eating disorder pathology (Fennig et al., ; Steiger, Goldstein, Mongrain, & Van der Feen, ). The participants described the immense struggle involved in attempting to separate from that largely self‐destructive perspective in order to claim for themselves, however hesitantly, a feeling and assertive self.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 90%