1990
DOI: 10.1002/1098-108x(199003)9:2<129::aid-eat2260090202>3.0.co;2-h
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Description of eating-disordered, psychiatric, and normal women along cognitive and psychodynamic dimensions
Abstract: To evaluate various psychological constructs used in formulations of anorexia and bulimia nervosa, we compared 76 eating‐disordered, 20 psychiatric, and 24 normal women on measures of irrational cognitions, object‐relations disturbances, and defense styles. The eating‐disordered groups exhibited more disturbance on all measures than normals and many pathological elevations relative to psychiatric controls. Despite these differences, common qualitative features were identified in all patient groups, suggesting …
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
52
10
6
1
Citation Types
7
38
0
1
Year Published
Range
1991
2023
Publication Types
Select...
59
4
Relationship
6
57
Authors
Journals
Cited by 63 publications
(46 citation statements)
References 39 publications
7
38
0
1
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…They began therapy completely fused and identified with their inner critics, what they often called ‘my eating disorder voice’. This experience is consistent with existing literature, which has demonstrated that individuals with eating disorders are often highly self‐critical, a characteristic that works to maintain eating disorder pathology (Fennig et al., ; Steiger, Goldstein, Mongrain, & Van der Feen, ). The participants described the immense struggle involved in attempting to separate from that largely self‐destructive perspective in order to claim for themselves, however hesitantly, a feeling and assertive self.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 90%