2009
DOI: 10.3906/vet-0801-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description of dogs naturally infected with Hepatozoon canis in the Aegean region of Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that the disease can be seen in both sexes (Gavazza et al 2003). Some researchers (Paşa et al 2009) reported that females are more sensitive than males, while others (Gomes et al 2010;Aktas et al 2015;Tuna et al 2020) reported that males are more sensitive than females. In these studies, it is reported that there is no significant difference between the sexes (Paşa et al 2009;Gomes et al 2010;Aktas et al 2015;Tuna et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It has been reported that the disease can be seen in both sexes (Gavazza et al 2003). Some researchers (Paşa et al 2009) reported that females are more sensitive than males, while others (Gomes et al 2010;Aktas et al 2015;Tuna et al 2020) reported that males are more sensitive than females. In these studies, it is reported that there is no significant difference between the sexes (Paşa et al 2009;Gomes et al 2010;Aktas et al 2015;Tuna et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers (Paşa et al 2009) reported that females are more sensitive than males, while others (Gomes et al 2010;Aktas et al 2015;Tuna et al 2020) reported that males are more sensitive than females. In these studies, it is reported that there is no significant difference between the sexes (Paşa et al 2009;Gomes et al 2010;Aktas et al 2015;Tuna et al 2020). The positivity obtained in this study was found to be higher in males (11.11%) compared to females (7.69%), and no significant difference was detected (P > 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations