1996
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(96)00170-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description of deformed nuclei in the sdg boson model

Abstract: We present a study of deformed nuclei in the framework of the sdg interacting boson model utilizing both numerical diagonalization and analytical 1/N expansion techniques. The focus is on description of high-spin states which have recently become computationally accessible through the use of computer algebra in the 1/N expansion formalism. A systematic study is made of high-spin states in rare-earth and actinide nuclei.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A better agreement was found in Ref. [12] where the g boson was also included at the cost of additional free parameters. From the trajectories in the IBM symmetry triangle found in Ref.…”
Section: Ibm and Cbs Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A better agreement was found in Ref. [12] where the g boson was also included at the cost of additional free parameters. From the trajectories in the IBM symmetry triangle found in Ref.…”
Section: Ibm and Cbs Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The new transitions determined in the present experiments allow for a reliable deduction of the mixing with the yrast band. Using the E2 branching ratios of the 4+ and 6+ we have obtained Zp(4+) = 0.0110(54) and Zp(6+) = 0.0145(12), which agree within the error margins. For other states where both M1 and E2 transitions are possible…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effect of the different terms in the transition operator may play different roles, a combination of them may conceal some of the properties of the individual term. For instance, in the SU(3) limit of the sdg-IBM, each term in the E2 transition operator has an L(L+3) dependence, which plays an important role at large L. But this dependence disappears for the SU(3) generator form of the E2 transition operator; this L(L+3) dependence term is concealed, and leads to the reduction of collectivity problem [36,37]. To see the effect of each individual term, we have calculated the reduced matrix elements of sp, dp and df terms respectively.…”
Section: B the E1 Transition Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%