2012
DOI: 10.1504/ijhfms.2012.051097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description of boundary case methodology for anthropometric diversity consideration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The body mass index (BMI) was also calculated and reported in Table 2. The mean BMI was also found to be 21.95 kg/ m 2 and is within the normal range of 18.5-24.9 44 . The normality of the data distributions was also tested using skewness and kurtosis tests for validating the nature of data distributions representing the army population 42 , as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Reliability Measurementmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The body mass index (BMI) was also calculated and reported in Table 2. The mean BMI was also found to be 21.95 kg/ m 2 and is within the normal range of 18.5-24.9 44 . The normality of the data distributions was also tested using skewness and kurtosis tests for validating the nature of data distributions representing the army population 42 , as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Reliability Measurementmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Similarly, kurtosis Z-score depicted that only three body variables, i.e., popliteal length, hip breadth, and waist breadth were not normal, while the rest (90% body variables) could be considered normal. Brolin 44 , et al and Taifa and Desai 47 pointed out that stature and other limb measurements are often normal, irrespective of small sample size. In related literature 48,49 , it has been documented that most of the anthropometric variables are normally distributed, even for smaller sample sizes; however, body weight often show a positively skewed distribution.…”
Section: Reliability Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CAESAR database on Asian population (SAE International, 2022) was used to obtain anthropometric data of 176 individuals (83 male and 93 female). This data was used to create two confidence ellipsoids, one for males and one for females, both with a confidence interval of 95% (Brolin et al, 2012). Using the method described in Högberg et al (2011), considering axial and centre cases of both ellipsoids, a family of 10 manikins (Table 1) was created in IPS IMMA (Figure 5).…”
Section: Representation Of Anthropometric Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A manikin family of 7 females and 7 males was considered in the simulations. The anthropometric measurements of the manikin family were generated from two three-dimensional boundary ellipsoids, with a confidence level of 90% (Brolin et al, 2012). One ellipsoid for each sex, based on stature, body weight, and sitting height.…”
Section: Comparison Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%