“…Many qualitative and quantitative techniques have been used to differentiate or subdivide sequences of alluvial fan surfaces. The most common techniques include (1) mapping characteristics of a fan surface in the field by describing surface clast size, rock varnish accumulation, desert pavement development, stratigraphic relationships, and evaluation of surface morphology [ Colman and Pierce , ; Wells et al ., ; McFadden et al ., ; Bull , ; Ritter et al ., ; Birkeland , ]; (2) using soil stratigraphy and the relative degree of soil development [ McFadden et al ., ; Bull , ; McDonald et al ., ; Bacon et al ., ]; (3) mapping fan surfaces based on the difference of the surface brightness manifested in aerial or satellite images [ Christenson and Purcell , ; Bull , ]; (4) analysis of remotely sensed multispectral images [ Alwash et al ., ; White , ; Farr and Chadwick , ; Beratan and Anderson , ], multichannel thermal infrared images [ Gillespie et al ., ], hyperspectral images [ Crouvi et al ., ], and radar images [ Kierein‐Young , ]; (5) analysis of digital elevation models [ Frankel and Dolan , ]; and (6) application of cosmogenic age dating techniques to determine the ages of the alluvial deposits and the rates of arid‐region alluvial processes [ Nichols et al ., , 2006; Matmon et al ., ].…”