1997
DOI: 10.1590/s0074-02761997000800029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description of an in vivo model for the assessment of eosinophil chemoattractants in the mouse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that the inhibition observed (28%) may be underestimated as the egg itself accounts for some of the granuloma area that, if excluded, would revert in a larger percent inhibition. The slight fall in EPO activity found in the present study is in agreement with previous data in that eosinophils should be less recruited in the absence of CCL3 (49). A reduction in the number of eosinophils may have contributed to the smaller size of granulomas present in the liver of CCL3-deficient mice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is noteworthy that the inhibition observed (28%) may be underestimated as the egg itself accounts for some of the granuloma area that, if excluded, would revert in a larger percent inhibition. The slight fall in EPO activity found in the present study is in agreement with previous data in that eosinophils should be less recruited in the absence of CCL3 (49). A reduction in the number of eosinophils may have contributed to the smaller size of granulomas present in the liver of CCL3-deficient mice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The infiltration is most likely caused directly by C5a, a known eosinophil chemoattract ( Yancey 1988, Gerard & Gerard 1994). Interestingly, in this model, the lack of C5a‐mediated chemotaxis on eosinophils could not be compensated by redundant mechanisms, as for example those driven by eotaxin or MIP‐1α ( Texeira et al . 1997 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed, they are potent eosinophil and lymphocyte chemoattractants (3,29,35,39,41,42), which comprise the principle infiltrating cells in the mouse model of FI-RSV-induced enhanced pathology (23,43,44). Alternatively, the relatively homeostatic kinetics of MCP-1, MIP-1␣, MIP-1␤, MIP-2, Ltn, and RANTES gene expression at early time points postchallenge in this group suggest that these chemokines are not implicated in initiation of the associated pathology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%