Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
40th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-4742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description of a Website Resource for Turbulence Modeling Verification and Validation

Abstract: The activities of the Turbulence Model Benchmarking Working Group -which is a subcommittee of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) Fluid Dynamics Technical Committee -are described. The group's main purpose is to establish a web-based repository for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes turbulence model documentation, including verification and validation cases. This turbulence modeling resource has been established based on feedback from a survey on what is needed to achieve consistency and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
79
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Utilizing the verified grid available from Rumsey et al, 23 calculations were performed using the original SST and BSL formulations as well as SST with variations in a 1 . The pressure distribution plot in Fig.…”
Section: Axisymmetric Separated Diffusermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Utilizing the verified grid available from Rumsey et al, 23 calculations were performed using the original SST and BSL formulations as well as SST with variations in a 1 . The pressure distribution plot in Fig.…”
Section: Axisymmetric Separated Diffusermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this case and the next two benchmark low subsonic test cases, grids and boundary conditions that are available on the turbulence modeling website described in Ref. 23 were employed. All of the grids were previously verified to yield grid independent solutions.…”
Section: Flat Plate Boundary Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. Do verification tests of turbulence models 38 before applying them to complex flows. There was an effort in DPW-V to do some verification tests, but most participants did not run a grid convergence for the turbulence model verification cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Use common nomenclature 38 when reporting the turbulence model. This is still not universally applied; variants in base turbulence models such as SA will give different results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Report iterative convergence results 3. Use common nomenclature 33 when reporting the turbulence model 4. Do verification tests of turbulence models 33 before applying them to complex flows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%