2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54066-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description Logics in Multimedia Reasoning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The suggested stages for the construction of an ontology from REFSENO in the Conceptual level are: i) Construction, ii) Evolution and iii) Validation. In addition to these stages, for the definition of OntoAgile was also followed the Description Logic -DL for being more expressive than the propositional logic [43].…”
Section: Refseno: a Representation Formalism For Software Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suggested stages for the construction of an ontology from REFSENO in the Conceptual level are: i) Construction, ii) Evolution and iii) Validation. In addition to these stages, for the definition of OntoAgile was also followed the Description Logic -DL for being more expressive than the propositional logic [43].…”
Section: Refseno: a Representation Formalism For Software Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RBox axioms Most multimedia ontologies described in the literature correspond to formalisms in which the knowledge base is defined as the combination of a TBox and an ABox (Sikos, 2017b). RBox axioms are supported in very expressive DLs only, such as SROIQ, to collect all statements related to roles and the interdependencies between roles, including a role hierarchy, a finite collection of generalized role assertion axioms of the form R ⊑ S, role equivalence axioms of the form R ≡ S, complex role inclusions of the form Table 4.…”
Section: Abox Axiomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MPEG-7 descriptors can be used for tasks such as generating video summaries [7] and matching video clips [8], however, they do not convey information about the meaning of audiovisual contents, i.e., they cannot provide high-level semantics [9]. Nevertheless, MPEG-7 terms can be used for low-level descriptors.…”
Section: A Intended Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four fundamental ontologies that can be employed in video representation, and are imported by several higherlevel video ontologies, are the SWRL Temporal Ontology, 8 the Event Ontology, 9 the Timeline Ontology, 10 and the Multitrack Ontology. 11 There are many common terms that are defined by multiple ontologies (which is discouraged according to Semantic Web best practices [15]), sometimes with a slightly different name.…”
Section: Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%