2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description and repeatability of a newly developed spinal cord injury scale for dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
139
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
139
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively lower agreement for the moderate to high‐grade ataxia could be explained by the large variation between raters when assessing horses with a median ataxia grade of 2 (Fig 1). We also found a more pronounced disagreement for the assessment of ataxia in horses compared to a new scale applied to assess dogs with spinal cord injury using the Texas Spinal Cord Injury Score (TSCIS) with separate components of gait, proprioceptive positioning and nociception 38. Two blinded raters had excellent agreement (ranging from 0.72 to 1.00) across all criteria when rating 36 dogs 38.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The relatively lower agreement for the moderate to high‐grade ataxia could be explained by the large variation between raters when assessing horses with a median ataxia grade of 2 (Fig 1). We also found a more pronounced disagreement for the assessment of ataxia in horses compared to a new scale applied to assess dogs with spinal cord injury using the Texas Spinal Cord Injury Score (TSCIS) with separate components of gait, proprioceptive positioning and nociception 38. Two blinded raters had excellent agreement (ranging from 0.72 to 1.00) across all criteria when rating 36 dogs 38.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This corresponds to findings in several studies. One study has validated the use of the MFS with high interrater agreement 31. Another study showed that the simpler MFS appears more appropriate for retrospective studies, in which prospectively derived examination information is not available 32…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dogs were classified as chondrodystrophoid or nonchondrodystrophoid on the basis of previously established criteria. 22 Complete physical and neurologic examinations were performed on all affected dogs on arrival at the hospital. A blood sample (2 mL) was routinely collected into a tube containing lithium heparin.…”
Section: Dogs With Acute Thoracolumbar Ivdh-betweenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurologic dysfunction was classified according to the MFS as follows: paraspinal hyperesthesia only (grade 5), ambulatory paraparesis and ataxia (grade 4), nonambulatory paraparesis (grade 3), paraplegia with intact nociception (grade 2), paraplegia with no superficial nociception (grade 1), and paraplegia with no deep nociception (grade 0). 22,23 After premedication of each affected dog, anesthesia was induced via IV administration of propofol a and anesthesia was maintained by use of inhalation anesthetic agents (sevoflurane b or isoflurane c ) for diagnostic imaging and collection of a CSF sample from the cerebromedullary cistern. Advanced imaging comprised myelography, computed tomography, or MR imaging; the type of imaging performed depended on access to equipment and clinician preference.…”
Section: Dogs With Acute Thoracolumbar Ivdh-betweenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation