2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(00)00440-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description and evaluation of a Newton-based electronic appetite rating system for temporal tracking of appetite in human subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluation of these subjective variables such as pain or appetite was traditionally conducted through VAS and data were collected with the use of classical paper and pen (P-P) (9). However, several authors have previously pointed several drawbacks of this methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The evaluation of these subjective variables such as pain or appetite was traditionally conducted through VAS and data were collected with the use of classical paper and pen (P-P) (9). However, several authors have previously pointed several drawbacks of this methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample size was estimated according to the variance observed in previous works (8,9). A minimum sample size of 12 subjects was estimated.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both techniques detected a significant difference between the high-and lowenergy lunches. A number of electronic devices have now been validated for administering a VAS with the main development requiring the participants to use a 'stylus' to mark their responses on the screen of the device -which is ergonomically similar to placing a mark on a paper VAS using a pencil (Stubbs et al 2001, Stratton et al 1998, Whybrow et al 2006Fig. 4).…”
Section: Appetite Ratings Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). All electronic devices can be accepted as a valid method for measuring appetite, but should not be used interchangeably with P&P. A number of studies have implemented the use of VASs to measure appetite and have shown a high degree of reproducibility (Delargy et al 1996, Stubbs et al 2001, Stratton et al 1998, Whybrow et al 2006, with a number of reviews commenting on their validity and reliability (De Graaf 1993, Flint et al 2000, Stubbs et al 2000. It is important to note that key experimental studies have confirmed the validity and reliability of the laboratory test meal procedure (Gregerson et al 2008) and the use of VASs as a measure of the strength of the motivation to eat (Flint et al 2000).…”
Section: Appetite Ratings Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%