The study of human appetite and eating behaviour has become increasingly important in recent years due to the rise in body weight dysregulation through both obesity and eating disorders. Adequate control over appetite is paramount for the control of body weight and in order to understand appetite, it is necessary to measure eating behaviour accurately. So far, research in this field has revealed that no single experimental design can answer all research questions. Each research question posed will require a specific study design that will limit the findings of that study to those particular conditions. For example, choices will be made among the use of laboratory or free-living studies, time period for examination, specific measurement techniques and investigative methodologies employed. It is important that these represent informed decisions about what design and which methodology will provide the most meaningful outcomes. This review will examine some of the 'gold standard' study designs and methodologies currently employed in the study of human appetite and eating behaviour.
Homeostatic vs hedonic eating behaviourTraditionally, homeostatic regulation has been associated with the regulation of the internal milieu as developed by Claude Bernard during the 19th century. In the field of appetite, homeostasis is used to explain the quantitative changes in eating and food intake such as those that occur in order to correct any energy deficit. Richter (1943) subsequently used the term 'behavioural regulation of internal states' to indicate how eating behaviour operated to maintain physiological functioning. Hedonic aspects of appetite are those that are concerned with the influence of reward, pleasure and palatability on eating. The 'homeostatic system' comprises a network of gastrointestinal peptides and brain neurotransmitters, and also peripheral neural signalling and adipokines such as leptin. This system has been described, for example, by Schwartz et al. (2000) and updated by Halford & Blundell (2000) and Blundell et al. (2012), and it illustrates how physiological signals of energy requirements are integrated with the motivation to eat via sensations of hunger and fullness. This review was commissioned to strictly address the behavioural aspects of appetite control, which provide the foundation for obtaining valid and reliable measured changes in the actual behaviour of eating (and food selection) and in the associated motivational states that often determine the initiation, direction and duration of any feeding event. However, it is recognised that these behaviours emanate from a complex and sophisticated set of physiological pathways in the periphery and the brain. The actual behavioural expression of human appetite should be interpreted against this background physiological state. Description of the physiology is not within the scope of this chapter, but the reader is directed to recent reviews in order to put the behavioural aspects of appetite within a physiological context (Konturek et al.