2014
DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2014.889318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Describing and assessing track geometry quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A simple approach could be to determine the peak values (reversal points) of the signals and use their amplitudes. However, in an approach applied to the DYNOTRAIN data, [92] it is supposed that the vehicle response will not only depend on the amplitude of the track defect but also on its length. This is obtained by approximating the track geometry by triangles of variable length and height.…”
Section: 312mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A simple approach could be to determine the peak values (reversal points) of the signals and use their amplitudes. However, in an approach applied to the DYNOTRAIN data, [92] it is supposed that the vehicle response will not only depend on the amplitude of the track defect but also on its length. This is obtained by approximating the track geometry by triangles of variable length and height.…”
Section: 312mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[92] The parameterisation using the wavelet analysis was based on the continuous wavelet transform using the Mexican Hat wavelet. In order to describe the track geometry by characteristic values indicating the amplitude and the length of the defects, the maximum values of the coefficient matrix are identified.…”
Section: 312mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no paper for WP2, but see a previous publication. 4 WP3 had the objective to define an effective conicity for vehicle acceptance in both EN 14363 and the rolling stock TSI. This work is covered by the paper 'A multi-national survey of the contact geometry between wheels and rails' by Zacher et al…”
Section: Dynotrainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using track data from DynoTRAIN WP 1 [1] and WP 2 [2] and wheel and rail profiles from WP 3 [3], a number of vehicle dynamic simulations were also undertaken to confirm the relationships found and investigate others, such as with wheel-rail friction, that were not available from the tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%