2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31603-6_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Describing and Assessing Image Descriptions for Visually Impaired Web Users with IDAT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternative texts (alt text) are descriptions of images that are added to an image in a PDF document to help screen reader users understand what the image is all about. A good description facilitates understanding of the image (Nganji, Brayshaw, & Tompsett, ).…”
Section: Methods and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative texts (alt text) are descriptions of images that are added to an image in a PDF document to help screen reader users understand what the image is all about. A good description facilitates understanding of the image (Nganji, Brayshaw, & Tompsett, ).…”
Section: Methods and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order for people with visual impairments to be able to perceive information presented in non-text elements such as images, a meaningful and appropriate description needs to be supplied. If this is not done, users who depend solely on screen readers will not be able to understand the information presented in the graphics (Nganji et al, 2013a). This important requirement of adding alternative texts is related to WCAG 2.0 Success Criterion 1.1.1: Non-text Content.…”
Section: The Images In the Document Have Alternative Textsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Systems that anticipate their use by people with disabilities and are thus designed to accommodate their needs are disability-aware systems. By contrast, where accessibility considerations are not incorporated into the design of systems, for example, where there are no alternative texts for images, it becomes difficult for assistive technology users to understand the information presented (Nganji et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this paper we will deal with how we can personalise this choice mechanism. The first part of the paper represents a generalisation of work on personalisation for special needs [1][2][3][4][5][6] to employ an Ontology-Based Community of Agents for Personalisation of Services for students in general. The second part looks at how we can use same mechanisms to personalise group project undertakings and assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%