Describing and analyzing learning in action: An empirical study of the importance of misconceptions in learning science

Abstract

Although misconceptions in science have been established in interview studies, their role during the learning process is poorly examined. In this paper, we use results from a classroom study to analyze to what extent nonscientific ideas in electrochemistry that students report in interviews enter into their learning in a more authentic setting. We audio-recorded talk between eight pairs of Swedish upper secondary students during a practical on electrochemical cells. Learning was operationalized on a discursive level as a description of what students do and say when taking part in an activity. This enabled an analysis of how encounters with misconceptions influenced the development of students' reasoning, compared to other encounters during the learning experience. Misconceptions did not constrain the development of students' reasoning. Rather, their reasoning developed in response to the contingencies of the specific situation. When misconceptions were encountered, they appeared as alternatives and questions not actively defended. Sometimes, encounters with these misconceptions were generative of the students' reasoning. The results indicate that demonstrating misconceptions in interviews is not enough to assume that they interfere with learning in other contexts. Educational implications and future This study is part of the project "How Can Teachers Aid Students Towards Scientific Reasoning" funded by the Swedish Research Council.Correspondence to: Karim M. Hamza;

Misconceptions About Sound Among Engineering Students

“…In contrast, the use of IT tools to supplement traditional teaching activities is not in and of itself effective with regard to challenging misconceptions about sound, but rather requires additional supports (Houle and Barnett 2008). Hamza and Wickman (2008) have played down the influence of misconceptions on learning science in secondary education, at least in some fields (electrochemistry). In contrast, according to Smolkin et al (2009), knowing the possible misconceptions and taking them into account is important for science teachers in general before entering the classroom (Schmidt 1997), especially for science teachers who use trade books.…”

Addressing Undergraduate Student Misconceptions about Natural Selection with an Interactive Simulated Laboratory

“…Although cultural and political viewpoints affect student understanding (Almquist and Cronin 1988;Sinclair et al 1997;Hokayem and BouJaoude 2008), even students who claim to accept evolutionary theory often demonstrate little understanding of its basic principles (e.g., Bishop and Anderson 1990;Demastes et al 1995). These misunderstandings are instead often directly linked to students having their own incorrect conception of the functioning of the world (known as misconceptions), which prevents them from being able to use scientifically accepted concepts in thinking through some scientific problems (Greene 1990;Ferrari and Chi 1998; but see Hamza and Wickman 2008).…”

Syften och tillfälligheter i högstadie- och gymnasielaborationen: En studie om hur elever handlar i relation till aktivitetens mål<br>Purposes and contingencies in the lower and upper secondary school lab

“…Andra exempel är att förstå hur laborationsutrustningen fungerar, om SI-enheter ska tillämpas och hur olika räkneoperationer ska utföras. Även om tillfälligheter som dessa bör förstås som centrala och naturliga delar i lärprocessen (Hamza & Wickman, 2008) utgjorde de en perifer del i aktiviteten att utreda och förstå sambandet. Elevernas göranden under laborationen berörde därför i liten utsträckning begreppen massa, kraft och acceleration samt relationen mellan dem.…”