2011
DOI: 10.5354/0717-6759.2010.11206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Descentralización del Estado y Terremoto: El caso de Chile

Abstract: El presente artículo ofrece un marco analítico dentro del cual racionalizar y optimizar la gestión de catástrofes. El modelo planteado se basa en argumentos económicos tradicionales que justifican la acción del Estado, los cuales son puestos en el contexto de una función de producción de "seguridad ante catástrofes". Se examina el caso del terremoto de Chile del 27 de febrero del 2010, haciendo especial énfasis en la "tecnología" implícita en el manejo de sus efectos y las debilidades en la etapa de prevención… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study addresses the context of the earthquake and tsunami of February 27, 2010 (27F) in Chile, which generated multiple social, cultural, political and economic impacts at the country level ( CEPAL, 2010 ). Many individuals and families, especially in coastal areas, lost family members and material goods, along with the emergence of a sense of vulnerability, lack of protection and insecurity, because of the measures and actions of the Chilean State that presented deficiencies in relation to the basic organization of the supply of essential inputs and products to address the emergency and provide public safety ( Letelier, 2010 ). Based on this, it is interesting to see how, after an initial stage of alarm at a later stage, people generate shared actions oriented at seeking meaning and understanding ( Zech and Rimé, 2005 ) through verbal interaction that provokes a common evaluation of events ( Von Scheve and Ismer, 2013 ), through the social sharing of emotions and community assessment.…”
Section: Study Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study addresses the context of the earthquake and tsunami of February 27, 2010 (27F) in Chile, which generated multiple social, cultural, political and economic impacts at the country level ( CEPAL, 2010 ). Many individuals and families, especially in coastal areas, lost family members and material goods, along with the emergence of a sense of vulnerability, lack of protection and insecurity, because of the measures and actions of the Chilean State that presented deficiencies in relation to the basic organization of the supply of essential inputs and products to address the emergency and provide public safety ( Letelier, 2010 ). Based on this, it is interesting to see how, after an initial stage of alarm at a later stage, people generate shared actions oriented at seeking meaning and understanding ( Zech and Rimé, 2005 ) through verbal interaction that provokes a common evaluation of events ( Von Scheve and Ismer, 2013 ), through the social sharing of emotions and community assessment.…”
Section: Study Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To appraise the extent to which these natural hazards represent a disaster risk, it is important to learn more about both the hazards involved and the vulnerability that exposed communities live with. While numerous studies have examined the geophysical features of earthquakes and tsunamis in Chile (Lomnitz 2004;Kiser and Ishii 2011;Yamazaki and Cheung 2011;Brodsky and Lay 2014;Hayes et al 2014;Cisternas et al 2005), only a few have dealt with more societal aspects of vulnerability (Lomnitz 1970;Bitar 2010;Letelier 2010;Mella Polanco 2012;Dussaillant and Guzman 2014). This study aims to contribute to the body of literature dealing with the latter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%