2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59719-1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DeScarGAN: Disease-Specific Anomaly Detection with Weak Supervision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some papers also show semi-supervised methods outperforming Constraint Programming using 3 constraints fully supervised methods. These outperforming methods are based on classical feature extraction followed by multipleinstance learning (MIL) based models [49], through adaptations to GANs [27] (using skip-connections and weightsharing subnetworks) and through the adaptation of AEs to the SegAE model [32] (using pairs of T1-w, T2-w and FLAIR data for improved anomaly detection). For this improvement in comparison to fully supervised models, Khosla et al [32] reason that fully supervised methods systematically either under or overestimate lesion volumes (when segmenting lesions), while their proposed method was reported to be free of this bias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some papers also show semi-supervised methods outperforming Constraint Programming using 3 constraints fully supervised methods. These outperforming methods are based on classical feature extraction followed by multipleinstance learning (MIL) based models [49], through adaptations to GANs [27] (using skip-connections and weightsharing subnetworks) and through the adaptation of AEs to the SegAE model [32] (using pairs of T1-w, T2-w and FLAIR data for improved anomaly detection). For this improvement in comparison to fully supervised models, Khosla et al [32] reason that fully supervised methods systematically either under or overestimate lesion volumes (when segmenting lesions), while their proposed method was reported to be free of this bias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aims to enhance visual similarity with the original image. DeScarGAN [23] adopts this loss function in its own GAN architecture and has outperformed Fixed-point GAN in their case study for Chest X-Ray pathology identification and localisation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are not many unsupervised anomaly detection baselines available for direct comparison due to three reasons: (i) no publicly released code [25,72,74,81], (ii) requiring weak/strong manual annotation [56,68,75,84], and (iii) relying on additional information from other modalities [17,46]. Therefore, we considered six major baselines for direct comparison: MemAE [13]-a Memory Matrix based method, Ganomaly [1]-a GAN-based method, f-AnoGAN [57]-the current state of the art for medical imaging, and CutPaste [37], PANDA [52], M-KD [56]the most recent unsupervised anomaly detection methods.…”
Section: Baselines and Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%