2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-022-01718-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DESC: Domain Adaptation for Depth Estimation via Semantic Consistency

Abstract: Accurate real depth annotations are difficult to acquire, needing the use of special devices such as a LiDAR sensor. Self-supervised methods try to overcome this problem by processing video or stereo sequences, which may not always be available. Instead, in this paper, we propose a domain adaptation approach to train a monocular depth estimation model using a fully-annotated source dataset and a non-annotated target dataset. We bridge the domain gap by leveraging semantic predictions and low-level edge feature… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…My algorithm is based on the GASDA algorithm, and it has a convincing improvement compared with the classical algorithm and the GASDA [15] algorithm. Compared with the state-of-the-art algorithms, the DESC algorithm proposed by Mikolajczyk et al [32] requires additional semantic segmentation of the source domain and ground truth labels of edge images in order to effectively improve the performance of the algorithm.This process is complex and resource-intensive In contrast, we have achieved some surpassing indicators by using only simpler and less prior information.The following five scale-invariant metrics are used to measure the performance of the algorithm: Here, T represents the total number of pixels across all test images. d k ,d gt k represent the predicted depth and ground-truth depth, respectively, corresponding to the kth pixel.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…My algorithm is based on the GASDA algorithm, and it has a convincing improvement compared with the classical algorithm and the GASDA [15] algorithm. Compared with the state-of-the-art algorithms, the DESC algorithm proposed by Mikolajczyk et al [32] requires additional semantic segmentation of the source domain and ground truth labels of edge images in order to effectively improve the performance of the algorithm.This process is complex and resource-intensive In contrast, we have achieved some surpassing indicators by using only simpler and less prior information.The following five scale-invariant metrics are used to measure the performance of the algorithm: Here, T represents the total number of pixels across all test images. d k ,d gt k represent the predicted depth and ground-truth depth, respectively, corresponding to the kth pixel.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach involves a synthetic data corpus and their labeled counterparts as the source domain, with real but unlabeled data as the target domain. The objective is to train a depth estimation task network in the source domain in a supervised manner and then generalize it to the target domain, creating a network model that can predict depth in the target domain [1,[31][32][33]. The UDA depth estimation algorithm has undergone multiple iterative improvements.…”
Section: Unsupervised Domain Adaptative Depth Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unsupervised domain adaptative object detectors are proposed with various domain adaptation mechanisms. These mechanism can be listed as based on adversarial learning, 14,15,[25][26][27][28] image-toimage translation, [28][29][30] pseudo-label self training, 16,[31][32][33][34] mean-teacher training for cross domain. 35,36 Many domain adaptive object detectors are proposed based on adversarial learning.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the goal is to close the gap between both domains. There is already a large body of literature on UDA for 2D object detection in driving scenes [5,10,11,15,38,40,49,54,66]. Due to the growing number of publicly available large-scale autonomous driving datasets, UDA on 3D point cloud data has gained more interest recently [1,12,30,62].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%