We have continued the preclinical evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the hexadentate phenolic aminocarboxylate iron chelator N, N-bis(2-hydroxybenzyl) ethylenediamine-N, N-diacetic acid monosodium salt (NaHBED) for the treatment of both chronic transfusional iron overload and acute iron poisoning. We examined the effect of route of administration by giving equimolar amounts of NaHBED and deferoxamine (DFO) to Cebus apella monkeys as either a subcutaneous (SC) bolus or a 20-minute intravenous (IV) infusion. By both routes, NaHBED was consistently about twice as efficient as DFO in producing iron excretion. For both chelators at a dose of 150 mol/kg, SC was more efficient than IV administration. The biochemical and histopathologic effects of NaHBED administration were assessed. No systemic toxicity was found after either IV administration once daily for 14 days to iron-loaded dogs or after SC administration every other day for 14 days to dogs without iron overload. Evidence of local irritation was found at some SC injection sites. When the NaHBED concentration was reduced to 15% or less in a volume comparable to a clinically useful one, no local irritation was found with SC administration in rats. Because treatment of acute iron poisoning may require rapid chelator infusion, we compared the effects of IV bolus administration of the compounds to normotensive rats. Administration of DFO produced a prompt, prolonged drop in blood pressure and acceleration of heart rate; NaHBED had little effect. NaHBED may provide an alternative to DFO
IntroductionOver the past 3 decades, deferoxamine B (DFO, Figure 1) has demonstrated its iron-chelating efficacy for the treatment of both chronic iron overload and acute iron poisoning. 1,2 For patients who require chronic transfusion for thalassemia, sickle cell disease, myelodysplasia, or other refractory anemias, DFO has been a generally safe and effective therapeutic agent that can control body iron; alleviate hepatic, cardiac, and endocrine dysfunction; improve growth and sexual maturation; and extend survival. [3][4][5][6] In the treatment of acute iron poisoning, DFO may be lifesaving. Enteral administration can bind unabsorbed iron in the gastrointestinal tract, and intravenous (IV) infusion can help clear iron from the systemic circulation.Despite this admirable record, the limitations of DFO as an iron-chelating agent have also become evident. For patients with chronic iron overload, treatment with DFO is costly, inefficient, cumbersome, and unpleasant. The siderophore is still produced by large-scale fermentation of a strain of Streptomyces pilosus, 7 contributing to the expense of the drug. DFO is inefficient as an iron chelator; typically only 5% or less of the drug administered promotes iron excretion. Because gastrointestinal absorption is poor and circulatory elimination is rapid, effective therapy for chronic iron overload usually requires subcutaneous (SC) or IV administration by a portable infusion pump for 9 to 12 hours for 5 or 6 days each week. [8][9][10...