2001
DOI: 10.1086/319029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deriving the Electron Density of the Solar Corona from the Inversion of Total Brightness Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
138
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
138
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a nuisance for coronal studies in the visible as it obscures the signal from CMEs and coronal streamers. Accurate removal of the F-corona is essential for the derivation of coronal density structure (e.g., Hayes et al 2001) but the current F-coronal models are unreliable, as LASCO/C3 observations have shown. The failure of the models stems from our incomplete understanding of the physical properties and distribution of the dust in the inner heliosphere.…”
Section: Science Question 8: 'What Is the Dust Environment In The Innmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a nuisance for coronal studies in the visible as it obscures the signal from CMEs and coronal streamers. Accurate removal of the F-corona is essential for the derivation of coronal density structure (e.g., Hayes et al 2001) but the current F-coronal models are unreliable, as LASCO/C3 observations have shown. The failure of the models stems from our incomplete understanding of the physical properties and distribution of the dust in the inner heliosphere.…”
Section: Science Question 8: 'What Is the Dust Environment In The Innmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dolei et al 2015;Hayes et al 2001). We then derive the coronal electron temperatures starting from the electron density values and under the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium (see e.g.…”
Section: Doppler Dimming Analysis Of Outflow Velocities In Coronal Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8) deserve a further and more thorough analysis, also considering that such differences are indeed larger than the estimated density uncertainties, which are well below a factor of two (cf. Hayes et al 2001;Strachan et al 2002). We need to take into account that the pB inversion assumes axisymmetry, so that the derived density represents a structure with significant depth along the line of sight.…”
Section: Diagnostics Of Physical Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LASCO C2 pB images were also taken day by day from May 17 to May 22, 2004. The inversion of such pB data (see, e.g., Hayes et al 2001) provided daily electron density maps relevant to the portion of extended corona observed in UV, in the 2.25 to 6 R range of heliocentric distance. We also determined the electron density (N e ) below 2.25 R by adopting the method described by Parenti et al (2000), based on the dependence on N e of the ratio of the radiative and collisional components of the O vi 1032 Å line.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%