2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-014-0750-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deriving robust counterparts of nonlinear uncertain inequalities

Abstract: In this paper we provide a systematic way to construct the robust counterpart of a nonlinear uncertain inequality that is concave in the uncertain parameters. We use convex analysis (support functions, conjugate functions, Fenchel duality) and conic duality in order to convert the robust counterpart into an explicit and computationally tractable set of constraints. It turns out that to do so one has to calculate the support function of the uncertainty set and the concave conjugate of the nonlinear constraint f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
177
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
177
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A benefit of safety factors is that they do not increase the complexity of the problem at all. A disadvantage is, however, that one generally has to rely on experience when choosing a suitable value for s. Note that Problem (19) is equivalent to a robust version of Problem (7) with uncertain bounds P U j,k and P L j,k and a box uncertainty set, e.g. :…”
Section: Safety Factors Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A benefit of safety factors is that they do not increase the complexity of the problem at all. A disadvantage is, however, that one generally has to rely on experience when choosing a suitable value for s. Note that Problem (19) is equivalent to a robust version of Problem (7) with uncertain bounds P U j,k and P L j,k and a box uncertainty set, e.g. :…”
Section: Safety Factors Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For s = 1, Problem (19) is equivalent to the nominal problem and for s → ∞ the optimal solution is y l,j = z i,j = 0 for all (l, j), (i, j), i.e., the safest solution is producing nothing. To compare the safety factor approach with the robust optimization approach, we find the smallest safety factor s min which gives a feasible solution for the robust problem with a given uncertainty set U p .…”
Section: Safety Factors Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach, however, tends to find solutions that are too conservative to provide much more optimality. Later, Ben-Tal et al [21][22][23] carry out further research on the robust optimization theory and have made significant progress in robust convex optimization. However, as the resulting robust counterparts involve nonlinear problems, such methods cannot be applied to discrete optimization.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, robust counterparts of nonlinear uncertain inequalities have been derived based on convex analysis including support function, conjugate functions, Fenchel duality and conic duality, and in this work, both simple and complex types of uncertainty set have been studied. 11 In this article, a novel nonlinear robust optimization framework is proposed to address general nonlinear problems under uncertainty. The proposed method is based on linearization with respect to uncertain parameter around multiple realizations and an iterative algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%