1986
DOI: 10.2307/2413383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deriving Phylogenetic Trees from Allele Frequencies: A Comparison of Nine Genetic Distances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alleles were given alphabetic designations in order of decreasing mobility. Rogers' (1972) and Nei's (1978) distance values were calculated for analyses of within-species variation and for comparative purposes with earlier studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Alleles were given alphabetic designations in order of decreasing mobility. Rogers' (1972) and Nei's (1978) distance values were calculated for analyses of within-species variation and for comparative purposes with earlier studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opting for a phylogenetic method of analysis would result in loss of information because only one character state can be assigned to a particular taxon at a given locus. Consequently, distance-Wagner trees (Farris, 1972) based on Cavalli-Sforza and Edward's (1967) chord distance (Nei et al, 1983;J. S. Rogers, 1986) were constructed by use of the BIOSYS-1 computer program (Swofford and Selander, 1981).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the phenetic approach, a matrix of Nei's unbiased (DN; Nei, 1978) and Rogers' genetic distances (DR; Rogers, 1972) was computed, but because the former distance is not a metric (Rogers, 1986) only the latter will be used in subsequent analyses. The genetic relationships of the taxa were reconstructed with the distance-Wagner procedure (Farris, 1972).…”
Section: Plylogenetic Reconstmctionmentioning
confidence: 99%