ABSTRAGr.-Protein variation at 30 presumptive gene loci was examined among 36 populations comprising all species of spiny pocket mice (subfamily Heteromyinae). The bulk of betweensample genic variation involved fixed allelic differences. A distance-Wagner tree divided the heteromyines into two groups, one formed by Heteromys gaumeri and the other composed of all remaining taxa. Within this latter group, species of HeteTomys comprising the anomalus species group were genically most similar to members of the genus Liomys. A consensus distance-Wagner tree constructed by use of the jackknifing approach yielded eight unresolved lineages of heteromyines. Genic data support the monophyly of heteromyines relative to other heteromyid rodents, but do not support monophyly of Heteromys and Liomys. Allozyme data were mostly concordant with karyotypic data, but failed to support recent taxonomies based on morphological characters regarding interspecific relationships among species of HeteTomys. Genic and karyotypic data indicate that H. desmaTestianus is divisible into two moieties in southern Mexico, H. goldmani is not differentiated from geographically adjacent populations of H. desmaTestianus, and H. OTesteTus is not closely allied with H. nelsoni. Based on allozyme data, H. anomalus and H. austTalis are not closely related. Affinities among species of Liomys derived from allozyme data were in agreement with those based on morphological and chromosomal information, but indicate that L. pictus, as currently constituted, is paraphyletic. The amount of genic divergence within Heteromys from South America most likely precludes the gwerally accepted view of a recent invasion of South America by these mice.Spiny pocket mice of the heteromyid subfamily Heteromyinae (genera HeteTomys and Liomys-Honacki et aI., 1982) are a group in which morphological parallelism is widespread (Wood, 1935). Fossil remains are known from Pliocene, Pleistocene, and Holocene depositions but are indistinguishable from extant forms (Alvarez, 1982;Wood, 1935). Morphological variation within the subfamily is fairly well documented, and the view that heteromyines form a monophyletic lineage has never been contested. Among the morphological characters distinguishing Heteromys and Liomys from other heteromyids are several shared derived characters of the glans penis (Hafner and Hafner, 1983), exomorphology (Wood, 1935), and hair microstructure (Homan and Genoways, 1978). Genoways (1973) reduced the number of species in the genus Liomys from 11 to five, dividing these into three groups as follows: L. irroratus, L. pictus and L. spectabilis, and L. salvini and L. adspersus. In his revision, Goldman (1911) recognized 13 species of Heteromys, dividing them among two subgenera (Heteromys and Xylomys). He further divided the nominate subgenus into two species groups, anomalus and desmarestianus. Rogers and Schmidly (1982) evaluated the systematic relationships of H. desmarestianus, H. lepturus, H. longicaudatus, H. goldmani, and H. temporalis by examining variatio...